Driver Attention-Based Pedestrian Warning Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver-assistance technologies provide excessive warnings when the driver is already paying attention to potential hazards, which can be bothersome and distracting.

Innovation Solution

A driver-assistance apparatus that adjusts warning levels based on whether the driver visually recognizes a passerby, outputting lower intensity warnings when the driver is aware of the potential hazard and higher intensity warnings when they are not.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the driver-assistance technology issues warnings for all detected attention-requiring objects, then the driver can be alerted to potential dangers, but the driver may experience excessive warnings that are bothersome and distracting

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety warning reliabilityVSAvoiddriver distraction
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the warning output parameters (warning level, intensity, or suppression) based on the driver's visual attention state. When the driver is determined to be visually recognizing the object, the warning level is reduced or suppressed; when the driver is not visually recognizing the object, the warning level is increased. This parameter adjustment resolves the contradiction by adapting the warning intensity to the driver's current attention state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism by monitoring the driver's visual state through cameras and eye-tracking technology. The detected visual attention information is fed back to the warning control logic, which then adjusts the warning output accordingly. This closed-loop feedback system ensures warnings are appropriate to the driver's current situation, reducing unnecessary distractions while maintaining safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If the driver-assistance technology monitors driver visual state continuously, then appropriate warning levels can be determined, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarning adaptabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses a multi-functional camera system that serves both as a driver monitoring device and a visual recognition detection device. The same imaging devices used for driver assistance (front camera, rear camera, side cameras) are utilized to detect both the driver's visual state and the external environment. This universal use of existing components adds adaptability without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges the driver state monitoring function with the object detection function into a unified processing framework. Both the driver's visual attention and the external objects are analyzed by the same control unit using integrated image processing algorithms. This merging of functions reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate independent systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS20260018053A1Driver-assistance apparatus, driver-assistance method, and storage medium
Publication Date: 2026.01.15 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20260018053A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018053A1 patent drawing
  • US20260018053A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A driver-assistance apparatus attached to a moving body acquires a first captured image obtained by capturing a moving direction of the moving body and a second captured image obtained by capturing a driver of the moving body, and calculates a risk that the moving body collides with a passerby outside the moving body on the basis of the first captured image. The apparatus determines whether the driver visually recognizes the passerby on the basis of the second captured image; and causes an output device to output a warning at a warning level based on the calculated risk. When the driver visually recognizes the passerby, the apparatus outputs a warning at a warning level lower than a warning level based on the same risk when the driver does not visually recognize the passerby.