Driver Awareness Checker for ADAS Engagement Supervision

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) face challenges in ensuring driver engagement and situational awareness during automated driving, leading to increased distracted driving and safety risks due to disconnects between design assumptions and real-world usage.

Innovation Solution

An awareness checker system that employs a three-level monitoring system, including a driver awareness estimator, human machine interaction monitor, and awareness checker, to proactively engage drivers, maintain situational awareness, and reduce non-driving related tasks through positive reinforcement and interaction.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If ADAS features are designed to assist driving with minimal driver intervention, then automation capability is improved, but driver engagement and situational awareness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation capabilityVSAvoiddriver engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors driver attention state through sensor signals and driver monitoring systems, providing feedback about driver engagement levels. This feedback loop enables the system to detect when driver attention falls below required thresholds and trigger appropriate responses to restore engagement, thereby maintaining reliability while preserving automation benefits.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively interacts with the driver before complete disengagement occurs, using preliminary warnings and engagement prompts to maintain situational awareness. By detecting early signs of inattention and intervening beforehand, the system prevents full driver disengagement while allowing high-level automation to function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If driver monitoring is continuously performed to maintain situational awareness, then driver engagement is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver engagementVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent components: sensor-based information gathering, driver monitoring system signals, attention state detection module, and engagement assessment module. This segmentation allows each component to operate independently with defined interfaces, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining comprehensive monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multi-functional sensor signals that serve both primary vehicle control functions and driver monitoring purposes. The same sensor infrastructure supports multiple monitoring objectives (attention detection, engagement assessment, situational awareness verification), reducing the need for separate dedicated monitoring hardware and lowering overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the system proactively interacts with the driver to verify environmental perception, then driver situational awareness is improved, but information processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesituational awarenessVSAvoidinformation processing
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of continuously verifying all environmental perceptions, the system selectively interacts with the driver about specific critical elements of the driving environment. The awareness checker focuses on partial verification of key situational elements rather than comprehensive continuous verification, reducing information processing requirements while maintaining adequate situational awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses an intermediary awareness checker module that mediates between the complex environmental sensor data and the driver. This intermediary translates complex sensor information into simplified verification questions for the driver, reducing the information processing burden on both the system and the driver while maintaining situational awareness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12600363B2Awareness checker for enhancing collaborative driving supervision
Publication Date: 2026.04.14 ARRIVER SOFTWARE LLC
  • US12600363B2 patent drawing
  • US12600363B2 patent drawing
  • US12600363B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus includes an interface and a control circuit. The interface may be configured to (i) receive sensor-based information from a plurality of sensor signals from a vehicle platform of a vehicle and environmental information about an environment of the vehicle, and (ii) present one or more control signals to the vehicle platform. The control circuit may be configured to (i) detect whether an attention state of a driver is in an attentive state or an inattentive state in response to one or more of the plurality of sensor signals from the vehicle platform and a driver monitoring system, (ii) assess whether the driver is sufficiently attentive by monitoring the one or more of the plurality of sensor signals from the vehicle platform and the driver monitoring system, and (iii) maintain an awareness of the driver to the environment of the vehicle by proactively interacting with the driver to determine whether a perception of the driver of the environment of the vehicle corresponds with the environmental information and the sensor-based information received by the interface.