Driver Circuit Self-Test Mechanism for High-Side Switch Fault Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver circuits for electronic switches, particularly in high-side configurations, lack a reliable method to test the operation of shut-off circuits without additional connections, which is critical for aerospace applications where reliability and weight are paramount, and can lead to dormant faults going unnoticed.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a self-test mechanism that simulates a fault condition by using a self-test capacitor to delay the electronic switch's transition to a low impedance state, allowing the shut-off circuit to be tested without additional connections, and utilizing a controller to monitor the time delay and ensure correct operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If additional connections are added to test the shut-off circuit, then the reliability of testing improves, but the weight and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshut-off circuit testing reliabilityVSAvoiddriver circuit weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The driver circuit tests its own shut-off circuit functionality by temporarily simulating a fault condition during normal operation. The self-test capacitor is integrated into the existing circuit without requiring external test connections, allowing the circuit to self-diagnose and report its operational status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The self-test capacitor serves multiple functions: it is used during normal operation to control the switching timing, and simultaneously serves as a test stimulus during self-diagnostics. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate test equipment or additional connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If additional connections are added to test the shut-off circuit, then the testing capability improves, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshut-off circuit testing reliabilityVSAvoiddriver circuit complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The driver circuit tests its own shut-off circuit functionality by temporarily simulating a fault condition during normal operation. The self-test capacitor is integrated into the existing circuit without requiring external test connections, allowing the circuit to self-diagnose and report its operational status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The self-test functionality is merged with the normal operation circuitry. The same capacitor and control signals used during normal switching operation are also used to stimulate and test the shut-off circuit, combining two functions into a single integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Device complexity

If the shut-off circuit is not tested regularly, then the device complexity remains low, but dormant faults may go unnoticed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver circuit complexityVSAvoidfault detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The self-test function is activated periodically each time the switch is instructed to transition to a low impedance state. This periodic testing ensures that the shut-off circuit is regularly verified without requiring continuous complex monitoring systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller is prepared to detect the temporary high impedance state that occurs during self-test. By anticipating the test condition and being ready to interpret the timing information, the system can reliably determine shut-off circuit functionality without adding complex real-time monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the switch is delayed in attaining low impedance state for testing, then the shut-off circuit can be tested, but the switching speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshut-off circuit testingVSAvoidswitch transition speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The system compensates for the test-induced delay by having the controller monitor and measure the actual transition timing. By anticipating the delay and accounting for it in the timing analysis, the system can distinguish between normal switching variations and actual shut-off circuit faults.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The controller monitors the timing of the switch transition and uses this feedback to determine whether the shut-off circuit is functioning correctly. The measured timing information is fed back to the controller to make a diagnostic decision about circuit health.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP1763137B1A driver circuit
Publication Date: 2013.01.02 GOODRICH CONTROL SYST LTD
  • EP1763137B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1763137B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1763137B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A driver circuit (10) for an electronic switch (4), the driver circuit having a first input (I1) for receiving a first control signal, and a second input (V1) for receiving a signal from a current sensor (6), the driver circuit further including a shut-off circuit (55) for operating the electronic switch to cause an interruption to current flow in the event of a fault condition arising, such as current through the electronic switch exceeding a predetermined threshold (resistor 60, capacitor 62, resistor 6), wherein operation of the shut-off circuit can be invoked by a predetermined event at the first input (I1).