Driver Coaching System for Fuel Efficiency and Brake Wear Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Many drivers lack knowledge on optimizing vehicle use for fuel efficiency, brake wear minimization, and overall efficient operation, leading to suboptimal performance in these areas.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for driver coaching that compares a driver's efficiency data with that of other vehicles to provide personalized instructions and active controls for improving fuel efficiency, brake preservation, and travel time through a vehicle computing device equipped with sensors and a processor, which determines scores and offers real-time coaching.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If drivers operate vehicles without optimization knowledge, then driving simplicity is maintained, but fuel efficiency and vehicle preservation deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel efficiencyVSAvoiddriving complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables the vehicle to self-monitor and self-optimize its operation through automated sensors and processors that continuously track driving behavior and provide real-time feedback, allowing the vehicle to serve itself in improving efficiency without requiring the driver to manually optimize each parameter

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where sensor data from vehicle operation is processed and returned to the driver as coaching instructions, creating a closed-loop system that progressively improves driving efficiency through iterative learning and adjustment based on performance metrics

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Speed

If drivers use aggressive driving styles, then travel time is reduced, but brake wear and fuel consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidbrake wear
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of route conditions, traffic patterns, and vehicle state before critical events occur, allowing the driver to take preventive actions such as anticipatory braking or acceleration adjustments that avoid excessive brake wear while maintaining efficient travel times

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts optimal driving parameters based on real-time conditions, changing acceleration rates, braking points, and speed targets to balance travel time efficiency with component preservation, providing data-driven guidance on when to prioritize speed versus when to protect vehicle components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If drivers lack optimization knowledge, then driving simplicity is maintained, but vehicle efficiency and travel time optimization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle efficiencyVSAvoiddriving technique knowledge
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary intelligence layer between the driver and vehicle operations, where the processor and algorithms act as a mediator that translates complex efficiency optimizations into simple, actionable instructions for the driver, bridging the gap between advanced vehicle management and driver capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS10109218B2Systems and methods for driver coaching
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US10109218B2 patent drawing
  • US10109218B2 patent drawing
  • US10109218B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for driver coaching are described. One embodiment of a method includes determining first vehicle efficiency data from a first vehicle as the first vehicle is traversing a route, where the vehicle efficiency data relates to a driving efficiency of a driver of the first vehicle. The method may also be configured for determining second vehicle efficiency data associated with a second vehicle that previously traversed the route and determining a driver score from the first vehicle efficiency data. Some embodiments may also be configured for comparing the driver score with the second vehicle efficiency data to determine whether the driver can improve the driving efficiency and in response to determining that the driver can improve, providing instructions for traversing a remaining portion of the route, based on actions taken by the third party in traversing that portion of the route.