Motor Vehicle Control Calibration With Predictive Driver Deviation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current motor vehicle control systems lack the ability to adapt to individual driving behaviors, leading to suboptimal performance and reduced driver acceptance in assistance systems.

Innovation Solution

A control system incorporating a predictive model trained to reflect deviations in driving behavior, which adjusts control operations by combining a conventional controller's output with a second output variable from the predictive model, allowing for personalized adaptation to individual drivers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a uniform calibration of the control system is utilized, then the system is simple to implement and maintain, but it cannot adapt to individual driving behaviors of different drivers

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAdaptability to individual driving behaviorVSAvoidSystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into two independent components: a base controller with uniform calibration and a predictive model for individual adaptation. This segmentation allows the system to maintain simplicity in the base controller while adding adaptability through the separate predictive model that processes driver behavior data independently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The predictive model serves multiple functions: it captures individual driving behavior patterns, predicts driver intentions, and adjusts control operations accordingly. This multi-functionality enables a single added component to provide comprehensive adaptability without requiring multiple separate systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If the control system is adapted to individual driving behavior using a predictive model, then driver acceptance and effectiveness improve, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDriver acceptanceVSAvoidSystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The predictive model automatically learns and adapts to individual driver behavior patterns without requiring manual configuration or intervention. The system observes driver actions, builds predictive models autonomously, and applies adaptations automatically, making the complexity management self-service rather than requiring user setup.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the predictive model monitors actual driver behavior, compares it with predicted behavior, and refines its predictions accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables the system to self-optimize and improve driver acceptance over time without manual reconfiguration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If a predictive model is trained to reflect deviation of driving behavior, then the control system becomes personalized, but the training process and data requirements increase complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePersonalization capabilityVSAvoidTraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The predictive model is trained in advance during a calibration phase before actual use. During this preliminary action phase, the system collects and processes driver behavior data to establish baseline patterns. Once trained, the model requires minimal additional data processing during normal operation, as the heavy lifting of pattern recognition has already been completed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system collects more driver behavior data than strictly necessary for basic functionality during the training phase. This excessive data collection ensures comprehensive coverage of various driving scenarios and conditions, making the predictive model more robust and reducing the need for retraining in different situations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11858511B2Control system for a motor vehicle and method for adapting the control system
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 ROBERT BOSCH GMBH
  • US11858511B2 patent drawing
  • US11858511B2 patent drawing
  • US11858511B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A control system for a motor vehicle, for outputting a controlled variable, with the aid of which a directly controlled variable of a motor vehicle is adjustable via suitable control operations, in order to adapt the directly controlled variable to a reference variable of the control system. The control system includes a controller, which is configured to output a first output variable on the basis of the directly controlled variable of the motor vehicle, and on the basis of the reference variable of the control system. The control system further includes a predictive model, which may be trained to output a second output variable that reflects a deviation of a driving behavior of a driver of the motor vehicle from the first output variable of the controller. The controlled variable of the control system encompasses an addition of the first output variable and the second output variable.