Driver Distraction Assessment Using Equipment Offset and Gaze

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining driver distraction levels are inadequate as they either fail to account for the position of in-vehicle equipment or result in excessive warnings, leading to driver alertness issues and safety concerns.

Innovation Solution

A method that assesses driver distraction by considering the offset level of in-vehicle equipment relative to a reference direction, adjusting counter features based on this offset to accurately quantify visual distraction and issue warnings only when necessary.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If a fixed threshold is used to determine driver distraction, then the detection method is simple to implement, but the accuracy of distraction assessment deteriorates due to excessive warnings and false positives

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of implementationVSAvoidaccuracy of distraction assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of threshold determination from a fixed value to a dynamic value that adapts to different equipment configurations. The system adjusts the distraction threshold based on the offset level of in-vehicle equipment, allowing the threshold to vary according to the specific viewing angles and positions of equipment such as screens or mirrors. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining ease of implementation through automated parameter adjustment while significantly improving accuracy by accounting for equipment-specific factors.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamics into the threshold determination process by making the distraction threshold adaptive rather than static. The system dynamically adjusts the threshold based on real-time detection of equipment offset levels and driver gaze patterns. This dynamic approach allows the system to automatically adapt to different driving scenarios and equipment configurations, improving assessment accuracy without requiring complex manual calibration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the distraction threshold is set high to reduce warnings, then false positives are reduced, but safety deteriorates because warnings are not issued quickly enough when actually distracted

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidfalse warnings
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by adjusting the distraction threshold based on the offset level of equipment. When equipment is positioned with a large offset from the driver's natural viewing angle, the system automatically adjusts the threshold to account for the additional time required for the driver to return their gaze to the road. This dynamic parameter adjustment reduces false warnings while maintaining safety by issuing timely alerts when genuine distraction occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the distraction threshold is set low to improve safety response, then warnings are issued quickly, but driver alertness deteriorates due to excessive warnings leading to deactivation of the warning function

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety response timeVSAvoiddriver acceptance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes to dynamically adjust the distraction threshold based on equipment offset levels. By automatically adapting the threshold to the specific configuration of in-vehicle equipment, the system achieves quick safety response when needed while minimizing false warnings that would otherwise lead to driver frustration and deactivation of the warning function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Device complexity

If a simple binary approach is used to assess distraction, then the detection method is computationally simple, but accuracy deteriorates because it cannot account for the varying impact of different equipment positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputational complexityVSAvoidaccuracy of distraction assessment
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing equipment offset level as a variable factor in the distraction assessment. Instead of using a simple binary approach, the system adjusts the distraction threshold parameter based on the measured offset of equipment from the driver's reference viewing direction. This adds only minimal computational complexity while significantly improving accuracy by accounting for the varying impact of different equipment positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20240078821A1Method for determining a distraction level of a vehicle driver
Publication Date: 2024.03.07 AMPERE SAS
  • US20240078821A1 patent drawing
  • US20240078821A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for determining a distraction level of a driver of a vehicle includes acquiring the direction of the gaze of the driver and maintaining or incrementing or decrementing a counter assessing the distraction level as a function of the acquired direction. The method also includes acquiring an offset level of an item of equipment of the vehicle relative to a reference direction, and at least one feature of the counter is determined as a function of the offset level.