Driver Engagement Monitoring for Autonomous Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods fail to effectively monitor and maintain driver alertness and readiness when an autonomous vehicle system is engaged, leading to potential driving accidents due to inadequate assessment of driver behavior and skill degradation.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a processor, sensors, and a vehicle data server that monitors driver behavior and vehicle operations to determine driver readiness, alertness, and skill levels, recommending engagement or disengagement of the autonomous vehicle system and providing coaching to maintain driving skills.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional monitoring methods (PERCLOS, steering wheel sensors) are used to monitor driver alertness, then the system can detect basic driver states, but the monitoring effectiveness is insufficient and cannot accurately determine driver readiness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver alertness detection accuracyVSAvoiddriver readiness determination reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments driver monitoring into multiple independent assessment dimensions: eye closure metrics (PERCLOS), steering wheel interaction metrics (force, position, orientation), vehicle operation metrics (lane keeping, speed maintenance), and response time metrics. Each dimension is measured and evaluated separately to provide a comprehensive view of driver readiness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors driver behavior and provides real-time feedback by comparing actual performance against expected benchmarks. When deviations are detected (e.g., excessive steering corrections, prolonged eye closure), the system adjusts its assessment of driver readiness and can trigger alerts or require driver re-engagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of operation

If the autonomous vehicle system is engaged for part of a trip, then driver workload is reduced, but it becomes more difficult to monitor driver behavior and maintain driver alertness

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver workloadVSAvoiddriver monitoring reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessments of driver readiness before engaging autonomous mode and continuously re-evaluates during operation. It establishes baseline expectations for driver behavior and prepares intervention strategies in advance, ensuring driver alertness is maintained throughout the trip.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system dynamically adjusts its assessment criteria and thresholds based on the current operational mode (manual vs. autonomous), trip duration, and detected driver state. The system adapts its sensitivity and required response levels to match the current situation, maintaining appropriate monitoring intensity regardless of engagement status.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If the autonomous vehicle system transitions between engagement and disengagement, then control flexibility is improved, but driver confusion may occur and driving accidents may result

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol transition flexibilityVSAvoiddriver confusion and accident risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

Before transitioning control between manual and autonomous modes, the system performs preliminary checks to ensure the driver is ready for the transition. It anticipates potential confusion by verifying driver alertness and readiness metrics meet thresholds before allowing mode changes, preventing transitions when driver state is compromised.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides continuous feedback to the driver about the current operational mode and driver readiness status. During transition periods, it maintains communication about control status changes and driver performance, reducing confusion through clear, real-time information about system state and driver expectations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11294370B2Determining driver engagement with autonomous vehicle
Publication Date: 2022.04.05 LYTX INC
  • US11294370B2 patent drawing
  • US11294370B2 patent drawing
  • US11294370B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system, and computer program product of controlling driver interaction with an autonomous vehicle (AV) system for a vehicle are provided. In an embodiment, a signal indicating a present state of the driver is received. A signal indicating a past state of the driver is received. A present effectiveness of the driver is determined based on the received signals. A target level of engagement of the driver with the AV system is determined based on the present effectiveness of the driver.