Driver Feedback Monitoring for Responsive Driving Behavior

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to effectively assess and improve a driver's responsiveness to feedback regarding driving behaviors, which is crucial for safe and efficient vehicle operation.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising sensors and processors that monitor driving behaviors, provide feedback, and assess driver responsiveness by analyzing visual, audio, and other data to determine and adjust feedback delivery methods based on driver response.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feedback is provided to drivers regarding driving behaviors, then driver awareness and potential behavior improvement are enhanced, but driver responsiveness to feedback cannot be effectively assessed without additional monitoring systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver responsiveness assessmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to drivers about their driving behaviors and then monitors subsequent driving behavior to assess responsiveness. This closed-loop feedback mechanism allows the system to not only provide information but also evaluate whether the driver is responding to and acting on that feedback, thereby resolving the contradiction between providing feedback and assessing responsiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the driver's own driving behavior data to assess their responsiveness to feedback. By comparing driving behavior before and after feedback provision, the system enables self-assessment without requiring external evaluation, thus improving reliability while avoiding additional system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If multiple sensors and processors are deployed to monitor and assess driving behavior, then measurement precision and assessment accuracy are improved, but device complexity and installation requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving behavior measurement precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs multiple sensors (image sensors, audio sensors, accelerometers, gyroscopes, etc.) that serve multiple functions: capturing driving behavior data, providing feedback to drivers, and assessing driver responsiveness. This multi-functionality approach improves measurement precision across various driving parameters while avoiding the need for separate specialized systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines multiple sensing capabilities (visual, audio, motion sensing) and processing functions into an integrated driving behavior monitoring system. By merging these components into a unified system rather than separate systems, the patent achieves high measurement precision while managing device complexity through integration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If real-time feedback and continuous monitoring are implemented, then driver responsiveness is enhanced and safety is improved, but energy consumption and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver responsivenessVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system monitors driving behavior continuously but assesses responsiveness at periodic intervals by comparing driving behavior before and after feedback events. This periodic assessment approach maintains real-time monitoring capabilities while managing energy consumption by not requiring constant full-system activation for assessment purposes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system captures and stores driving behavior data before providing feedback, so that when feedback is given, the assessment of responsiveness can be performed using pre-captured data. This preliminary data collection allows for efficient real-time assessment without requiring continuous high-energy processing during the actual feedback and assessment moment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20260084702A1System and method to determine responsiveness of a driver of a vehicle to feedback regarding driving behaviors
Publication Date: 2026.03.26 SMARTDRIVE SYSTEMS INC
  • US20260084702A1 patent drawing
  • US20260084702A1 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to a system and method for determining responsiveness of a driver of a vehicle to feedback regarding driving behaviors. The system may include a sensor configured to generate output signals conveying first driving behavior information, which may characterize operation of the vehicle by the driver. The system may include one or more processors configured to obtain the first driving behavior information. The one or more processors may effectuate provision of feedback defined by feedback information based on the first driving behavior. The sensor may be configured to output signals conveying second driving behavior information, which may characterize operation of the vehicle by the driver during and/or subsequent to the provision of the feedback. The one or more processors may be configured to obtain the second driving behavior information and assess responsiveness of the driver to the feedback based on the second driving behavior information.