Autonomous Vehicle Driver Fitness Detection and Mode Intervention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing systems fail to accurately determine when an individual is unfit to operate a vehicle and effectively dissuade them from doing so, despite advancements in vehicle sensors and data generation.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that uses image sensors and sensor data to identify individuals within a vehicle, analyze their state, and generate control signals to alter the autonomous operation mode, providing real-time notifications to dissuade unfit operators.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If vehicle sensors and data generation capabilities are increased, then the ability to detect driver state improves, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver state detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies multi-functionality by using a single image sensor to perform multiple tasks: identifying the driver, detecting driver state (drowsiness, intoxication), and generating operational data. This eliminates the need for separate sensors for each function, thereby improving measurement precision while avoiding increased system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The existing vehicle sensors and image processing capabilities are leveraged to serve the additional function of driver state monitoring. The system uses already-present computational resources and sensor infrastructure to perform driver identification and state assessment, avoiding the need for entirely new hardware systems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If real-time driver state monitoring is implemented, then safety improvements are achieved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle operation safetyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by continuously capturing and pre-processing image data in real-time, maintaining a ready state for rapid driver state assessment. Image sensors continuously capture data and basic processing occurs in advance, enabling quick determination of driver fitness without delaying vehicle operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial monitoring by focusing computational resources on key indicators of driver fitness such as eye closure detection, facial color analysis, and head position monitoring. Rather than analyzing every aspect of driver behavior, the system targets specific partial indicators that most strongly correlate with driver unfitness, reducing overall processing time while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Object-affected harmful factors

If autonomous operation mode is altered based on driver state, then hazardous situations are reduced, but the loss of driver control and autonomy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehazardous driving situationsVSAvoiddriver control
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by implementing gradual escalations of autonomous intervention. Rather than immediately removing driver control, the system first provides warnings and alerts to the driver, then progressively increases autonomous operation levels only if the driver fails to respond or remains unfit, thereby reducing hazardous situations while preserving driver control as long as possible

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring driver responses to warnings and alerts, and by providing real-time information about driver state assessments. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust the level of autonomous intervention based on driver condition and response, maintaining driver control when appropriate while ensuring safety when necessary

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12397802B2Apparatuses, systems and methods for improving operation of autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US12397802B2 patent drawing
  • US12397802B2 patent drawing
  • US12397802B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for improving vehicular safety are provided. According to certain aspects, an electronic device may receive and analyze image data depicting an individual located within a vehicle. The electronic device may also access certain data related to a condition of the individual, and may accordingly determine whether the individual is fit to operate the vehicle. If the individual is unfit to operate the vehicle, the electronic device may alter autonomous operation of the vehicle.