Driver Gaze Feedback Control in Automated Motor Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated motor vehicles face a challenge in ensuring driver confidence during automated driving, as drivers may lack faith in the system's capabilities, leading to suboptimal use and potential safety issues due to distractions or disengagement.

Innovation Solution

An automated motor vehicle equipped with a sensor device to track the driver's viewing direction and a control device that outputs information to an information output device if the frequency of viewing changes exceeds a predetermined limit, using personalized cues like voice, name, and gender to address the driver's confidence and engagement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the driver continuously monitors the vehicle system during automated driving, then safety and control are improved, but the driver cannot engage in non-driving activities and the system is not fully exploited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddriver engagement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors the driver's viewing direction using sensor devices (cameras) and provides feedback through the control device when attention deficits are detected. This closed-loop feedback mechanism ensures safety by alerting the driver when necessary while allowing non-driving activities during normal operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated motor vehicle performs self-monitoring of the driver's attention state through integrated sensor devices and control algorithms, eliminating the need for continuous manual monitoring while maintaining safety through automated detection and alerting mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Ease of operation

If the driver engages in non-driving activities during automated driving, then ease of operation is improved, but driver confidence may be insufficient leading to safety issues

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver engagementVSAvoiddriver confidence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The control device provides targeted feedback to the driver based on monitored viewing behavior, reinforcing driver confidence by acknowledging their attention patterns and providing information about driving functions when attention deficits are detected, rather than simply issuing warnings.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system proactively supplies information to the driver before critical situations arise, based on predictive analysis of viewing direction patterns. This preliminary action builds driver confidence by demonstrating system awareness and preparedness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If the system proactively supplies information to the driver, then driver confidence is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver confidenceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control device performs multiple functions: it monitors viewing direction data from sensor devices, analyzes attention patterns, determines confidence levels, and provides information output. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate dedicated systems for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The control device acts as an intermediary between the sensor devices and the driver, processing complex sensor data and translating it into appropriate information outputs that build driver confidence without requiring direct complex interactions between all system components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Measurement precision

If the sensor device continuously tracks viewing direction, then driver attention monitoring is improved, but loss of information increases due to processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveviewing direction trackingVSAvoiddata processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The control device extracts only the essential information from continuous viewing direction data - specifically the frequency of viewing changes - rather than processing and storing all raw sensor data. This extraction approach maintains measurement precision while reducing information processing requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs continuous monitoring (excessive action) but processes only partial information - focusing specifically on viewing direction frequency patterns relevant to driver confidence assessment - rather than analyzing all possible aspects of driver behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20240317135A1Automated Motor Vehicle and Method for Controlling the Automated Motor Vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 BAYERISCHE MOTOREN WERKE AG
  • US20240317135A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated motor vehicle that has a sensor device which continuously determines a viewing direction of a person sitting on a driver's seat, and a control device connected to the sensor device. The control device determines a frequency of a change in the viewing direction on the basis of the viewing direction determined by the sensor device, compares the frequency with a predetermined limit value, and if the frequency is greater than the predetermined limit value, outputs a control signal to an information output device connected to the control device. The information output device outputs a predetermined item of information to the person sitting on the driver's seat after receiving the control signal.