Driver Gaze Verification for Autonomous Lane Change Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The safety of lane changes in autonomous driving systems can be compromised due to unforeseen behavior of other vehicles, even if detected by sensors.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving system that includes an internal vehicle camera to capture the driver's face and determine their line of sight, with a processor judging whether the driver has checked the surroundings and approved the lane change, using different safety conditions based on the presence of other vehicles in the destination lane.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the system requires driver confirmation and multiple safety checks for lane changes, then safety is improved, but the complexity of the control system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of lane changeVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety verification process is segmented into distinct conditions: when no other vehicle is detected (first condition requiring driver action) and when another vehicle is detected (second condition with more severe requirements). This segmentation allows the system to apply appropriate safety checks based on the specific situation, improving overall safety while managing complexity through conditional logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety verification requirements dynamically adjust based on the detection status of other vehicles. The system transitions between different safety verification modes (first condition vs. second condition) depending on the environmental context, allowing flexible adaptation to varying risk levels without requiring a uniformly complex control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the system uses sensor detection alone for lane change safety, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of safety confirmation deteriorates due to sensor malfunction or unforeseen vehicle behavior

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous lane change operationVSAvoidsafety confirmation reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates driver feedback through action detection (monitoring driver operations) to verify safety before lane changes. This feedback mechanism complements sensor detection, creating a multi-layered verification system that improves reliability while maintaining ease of operation through automated monitoring of driver responses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary safety verification by detecting driver actions and confirming safety conditions before executing the lane change. This preliminary check ensures that both sensor data and driver verification are satisfied, enhancing reliability while keeping the operation smooth through pre-validation of safety conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Ease of operation

If the system applies the same safety conditions for all lane change scenarios, then the ease of operation is improved, but the adaptability to different risk situations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane change executionVSAvoidadaptation to risk levels
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different safety verification qualities to different situations: the first condition applies when no other vehicle is detected, while the second condition (more severe) applies when another vehicle is detected. This local differentiation of safety requirements allows the system to adapt to varying risk levels while maintaining ease of operation through automated condition assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11834073B2Autonomous driving system
Publication Date: 2023.12.05 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11834073B2 patent drawing
  • US11834073B2 patent drawing
  • US11834073B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The autonomous driving system includes an internal vehicle camera, a vehicle detection device, and a processor configured to detect an angle of a facial direction or a line of sight of the driver, judge whether the driver has checked safety of the surroundings of the vehicle based on the angle, and control autonomous driving of the vehicle. The processor is configured to start a lane change of the vehicle when it is judged that the driver has checked the safety of the surroundings of the vehicle. The processor is configured to judge that the driver has checked the safety when a first condition has been satisfied if another vehicle has not been detected in a destination lane, and judge that the driver has checked the safety when a second condition more severe than the first condition has been satisfied if another vehicle has been detected in the destination lane.