Driver Guidance System Using Behavioral History Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing guidance systems face challenges in effectively retaining driver attention due to repetition, forgetfulness from infrequent guidance, and information overload, leading to reduced effectiveness in improving driving safety.

Innovation Solution

A system that generates guidance information by analyzing driver behavior and history to determine the most effective guidance type, using feature values based on match/mismatch of guidance types, and presenting targeted safety guidance through video analysis, optimizing the timing and content of safety messages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If guidance is continuously repeated to drivers, then the expected effect of guidance is achieved initially, but the recipient becomes inured to the guidance and the effectiveness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance effectivenessVSAvoiddriver attention
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts guidance issuance by analyzing driver behavior patterns and historical data. Instead of continuous static guidance, the system adapts the timing, frequency, and content of guidance based on real-time driver state assessment, preventing driver inurement while maintaining effectiveness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring driver responses to guidance and using this information to adjust future guidance issuance. The evaluation unit assesses whether guidance was effective and modifies subsequent guidance strategies accordingly, creating a closed-loop system that prevents driver desensitization

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Loss of information

If no guidance is received for an extended period of time, then driver attention is preserved, but the guidance can be forgotten and effectiveness is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver attentionVSAvoidguidance effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic guidance issuance based on analyzed driver behavior patterns rather than continuous or random timing. The determination unit identifies optimal intervals for guidance based on driver state, ensuring guidance is provided at intervals that maintain effectiveness without causing forgetfulness or excessive attention loss

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of driver behavior and historical data before issuing guidance to determine the optimal timing. By predicting when guidance will be most effective based on pre-analyzed patterns, the system ensures guidance is delivered at moments when driver attention and retention are maximized

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Quantity of substance

If a large amount of guidance is concentrated over a short period of time, then comprehensive safety information is provided, but the recipient has difficulty remembering all of the guidance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveguidance information volumeVSAvoiddriver memory retention
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments guidance information into smaller, manageable units based on driver behavior analysis. Instead of delivering large volumes of guidance concentrated in short periods, the determination unit divides guidance into discrete topics delivered at optimal intervals, improving driver memory retention while maintaining comprehensive safety coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies local quality by customizing guidance content and volume based on specific driver characteristics and behavior patterns. Each driver receives guidance tailored to their individual needs and cognitive capacity, rather than uniform large-volume guidance, optimizing retention effectiveness for each driver's specific context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12111168B2System for generating guidance information
Publication Date: 2024.10.08 LOGISTEED LTD
  • US12111168B2 patent drawing
  • US12111168B2 patent drawing
  • US12111168B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for generating guidance information for a driver includes a processor and a storage device. The storage device stores guidance history of the driver. The processor generates a feature value based on match/mismatch of guidance types abstracted from the guidance history. The processor determines a guidance type for the driver on the basis of the feature value. The processor generates information for issuing guidance of the determined guidance type to the driver according to driver monitoring information.