Driver Inattentiveness Detection via Steering Phase Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for detecting a driver's inattentiveness in vehicles are unreliable, as they solely rely on the detection of steering quiescent phases, leading to vague and inaccurate decisions about the driver's attention level.

Innovation Solution

A method that detects steering wheel movements, identifies a steering quiescent phase, and assesses its magnitude, along with the subsequent steering action, to determine the severity of inattentiveness by evaluating the variance ratio of steering wheel angles over time, and uses a multi-dimensional operator to link these phases, providing a more reliable measure of inattentiveness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If driver inattentiveness is detected solely based on steering quiescent phase detection, then the detection method is simple, but the reliability and accuracy of inattentiveness identification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection method complexityVSAvoidinattentiveness identification reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple detection indicators (steering quiescent phase duration, steering angle variance, and rate of change of steering angle) into a comprehensive evaluation system. This merging of multiple simple indicators resolves the contradiction by maintaining relative simplicity while significantly improving identification reliability compared to single-indicator methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from one-dimensional detection (only quiescent phase duration) to multi-dimensional detection by incorporating temporal dimension (duration), spatial dimension (steering angle variance), and rate-of-change dimension. This dimensional expansion enables more reliable inattentiveness identification without excessive complexity increase.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Device complexity

If only steering quiescent phase is evaluated, then the evaluation process is simple, but the measurement precision of driver attention level deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation process complexityVSAvoidattention level measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the steering wheel operation into distinct phases (quiescent phase and active phase) and evaluates each phase using appropriate metrics. During quiescent phase, it measures duration and variance; during active phase, it measures rate of change. This segmentation enables precise attention level measurement through multi-faceted evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically changes evaluation parameters based on driving phase: using variance and duration parameters during quiescent phases, and rate-of-change parameters during active phases. This adaptive parameter selection improves measurement precision by matching evaluation metrics to the actual driving state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If steering actions are not distinguished from quiescent phases, then the detection logic is simple, but the accuracy of inattentiveness identification deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection logic complexityVSAvoidinattentiveness identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic detection logic that automatically adapts to different driving phases. It continuously monitors steering angle characteristics and switches between quiescent phase evaluation mode and active phase evaluation mode based on real-time conditions. This dynamic adaptation improves identification accuracy while keeping the underlying logic relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from steering angle measurements to determine whether the driver is in a quiescent or active phase, and adjusts evaluation criteria accordingly. This feedback mechanism enables accurate distinction between phases and improves overall identification accuracy without requiring complex predetermined logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8035496B2Method and computer program for identification of inattentiveness by the driver of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2011.10.11 MERCEDES BENZ GROUP AG
  • US8035496B2 patent drawing
  • US8035496B2 patent drawing
  • US8035496B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method and a computer program for identifying when the driver of a vehicle, in particular a motor vehicle, is not paying attention. In order to make it possible to make a more reliable statement on the presence of any inattentiveness by the driver, the method observes a steering action following a steering quiescent phase, in addition to detecting the steering quiescent phase. The extent of the steering quiescent phase and of the steering action found are logically linked to one another, and the result of this logical operation is then used as a measure for the severity of the inattentiveness of the driver.