Driver Input Analysis for Fuel Economy Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Variations in driver performance significantly impact fuel economy, with driver habits often having a greater effect than technical engine or transmission improvements, necessitating a method to improve fuel economy through tailored driving recommendations.

Innovation Solution

A driver training method that processes vehicle and driver operating data to generate personalized driving recommendations, including window position adjustments and fuel economy performance tracking, to enhance fuel efficiency based on specific driving behaviors and conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Use of energy by moving object

If driver habits are not modified, then fuel economy performance remains poor, but driver behavior is difficult to change without personalized feedback

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefuel economy performanceVSAvoiddriver behavior modification
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system captures driver input data and vehicle operating data, processes this information to identify specific driving habits affecting fuel economy, and provides personalized feedback reports to the driver. This feedback loop enables drivers to understand the impact of their behaviors and make targeted improvements, directly resolving the contradiction between improving fuel economy and the difficulty of modifying driver behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Ease of manufacture

If generic fuel economy advice is provided, then implementation is simple, but effectiveness is reduced due to lack of personalization

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoideffectiveness of driving recommendations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system analyzes individual driver input patterns and vehicle operating conditions to generate personalized recommendations tailored to each driver's specific behaviors and driving context. Rather than providing generic advice, the system identifies the particular driving habits of each user and offers targeted feedback, thereby improving effectiveness while maintaining implementation simplicity through automated data processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive driver monitoring is implemented, then driving behavior analysis is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving behavior analysis accuracyVSAvoiddata collection and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system utilizes existing vehicle sensors and onboard computers to capture both driver input data and vehicle operating data, making the monitoring system multi-functional by serving both safety and fuel economy analysis purposes. This approach improves measurement precision for driving behavior analysis without significantly increasing device complexity, as it leverages already-present vehicle systems rather than adding dedicated monitoring hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS7765058B2Driver input analysis and feedback system
Publication Date: 2010.07.27 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US7765058B2 patent drawing
  • US7765058B2 patent drawing
  • US7765058B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method of driver training to improve fuel economy performance of a vehicle, the method including, receiving selected vehicle and driver operating data indicative of driving conditions and operator inputs captured during previous vehicle operation, processing the received selected vehicle and driver operating data, and generating driving recommendations to improve fuel economy performance based on the processed vehicle and driver operating data.