Driver Interactive System for Semi-Autonomous Feature Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers of semi-autonomous vehicles face difficulties in understanding the operation, usage scenarios, and limitations of semi-autonomous features, leading to potential misuse and inadequate awareness of when to take control of the vehicle.

Innovation Solution

A driver interactive system that uses a feature tracker to identify drivers, retrieve their profiles, and provide audiovisual training on activated semi-autonomous features, ensuring drivers receive necessary training before using these features, with options for multiple levels of training and alerts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If semi-autonomous features are added to vehicles to assist driver control, then vehicle automation capability is improved, but driver understanding and awareness of feature operation and limitations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle automation capabilityVSAvoiddriver understanding of feature operation
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides training information to the driver before the driver activates semi-autonomous features. The processor identifies when a driver has not yet been trained on a particular feature and presents training information through the infotainment system, ensuring drivers understand feature operation, usage scenarios, and limitations before use.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system tracks driver training status and provides feedback by presenting training information when activation is detected without prior training. The processor monitors which features have been activated and whether the driver has received training, dynamically providing educational content to bridge knowledge gaps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If comprehensive training on semi-autonomous features is provided to all drivers, then driver awareness and safety are improved, but system complexity and training time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver awareness and safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Training information is made available in advance through the infotainment system before drivers need to use features. Drivers can familiarize themselves with training materials at their own pace, reducing the complexity of real-time instruction and allowing the system to simply retrieve and display pre-prepared training content when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

Drivers access training information through the infotainment system at their own initiative or when prompted by the system. The driver identification sensor and processor work together to provide self-directed training where drivers can learn about features without requiring external instruction, reducing the burden on the system to manage complex training sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Device complexity

If training information is provided only after feature activation, then system simplicity is maintained, but driver safety and proper usage deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoiddriver safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system proactively identifies when a driver has not received training on a feature and presents training information before the driver attempts to use the feature. The processor detects activation attempts and intercepts them to provide necessary training first, ensuring safety without requiring complex post-activation training sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides immediate feedback when a driver attempts to activate a feature without prior training. The processor detects the lack of training status and automatically triggers training information delivery, creating a simple feedback loop that ensures safety without adding complex training management infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10108191B2Driver interactive system for semi-autonomous modes of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2018.10.23 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10108191B2 patent drawing
  • US10108191B2 patent drawing
  • US10108191B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method and apparatus are disclosed for a driver interactive system for semi-autonomous modes of a vehicle. An example disclosed vehicle with semiautonomous features includes memory and a processor. The example processor causes the vehicle to determine, with a driver identification sensor, the identity of a driver. The example processor also causes the vehicle to determine which semiautonomous features are flagged for training based on a driver profile of the identified driver. Additionally, the example processor causes the vehicle to, in response to the driver activating one of the flagged semiautonomous features, provide an audiovisual description of the semiautonomous feature.