Adaptive Driver Interface Using Eye Gaze for Alert Prioritization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing ADAS systems overwhelm drivers with multiple irrelevant warnings, leading to decreased situational awareness and potential neglect of critical alerts.

Innovation Solution

A system that analyzes driving scenes and eye gaze data to determine the importance and situational awareness of objects, selectively providing augmented reality cues and autonomous vehicle control based on object importance and driver awareness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple warning alerts are provided to drivers, then comprehensive safety monitoring is improved, but driver situational awareness deteriorates due to information overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoringVSAvoidsituational awareness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes the parameter of information presentation by adjusting alert priority levels and selectively displaying only high-priority warnings based on real-time situational assessment. This resolves the contradiction by transforming the static approach of displaying all warnings into a dynamic parameter-adjusted system that maintains safety monitoring while preventing information overload.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system segments the comprehensive safety monitoring information into priority levels (high, medium, low) and selectively presents only the most critical alerts to the driver. This segmentation allows the system to maintain thorough safety monitoring while reducing the cognitive load on the driver by filtering out non-critical information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Reliability

If comprehensive object monitoring is implemented, then safety coverage is improved, but system complexity increases due to multiple sensors and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs a multi-functional processor that handles diverse sensor inputs (cameras, LIDAR, radar) and performs multiple functions including object detection, classification, priority assignment, and alert generation. This universal processing approach maintains comprehensive safety coverage while reducing overall system complexity by consolidating multiple specialized components into a single multi-capable unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple sensor inputs and processing functions into a unified object monitoring and alert generation system. By combining camera, LIDAR, and radar data processing along with priority determination and alert presentation into an integrated system, comprehensive safety coverage is achieved while managing complexity through consolidation rather than proliferation of separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If real-time eye gaze tracking is implemented, then driver attention monitoring is improved, but processing time increases due to continuous data analysis

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattention monitoringVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of eye gaze data by continuously tracking and storing driver attention patterns in advance of critical events. This preliminary action allows the system to have attention monitoring data ready when needed, improving measurement precision without adding processing delays during critical decision-making moments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex continuous mathematical analysis of eye gaze data with rule-based heuristics and simplified algorithms that can quickly determine driver attention state. This substitution of sophisticated mechanical/mathematical processing with simpler decision rules maintains precise attention monitoring while significantly reducing processing time requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12559137B2System and method for providing a situational awareness based adaptive driver vehicle interface
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12559137B2 patent drawing
  • US12559137B2 patent drawing
  • US12559137B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for providing a situational awareness based adaptive driver vehicle interface that include receiving data associated with a driving scene of an ego vehicle and eye gaze data and analyzing the driving scene and the eye gaze data and performing real time fixation detection pertaining to the driver's eye gaze behavior to determine a level of situational awareness with respect to objects that are located within the driving scene. The system and method also include determining at least one level of importance associated with each of the objects and communicating control signals to control at least one component based on at least one of: the at least one level of importance associated with each of the objects that are located within the driving scene and the level of situational awareness with respect to each of the objects that are located within the driving scene.