Driver Maneuver Prediction Using Context-Adaptive Vehicle Probabilities

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle systems struggle to reliably predict human driver maneuvers due to the complexity of real-world environments, which affects the effectiveness of driver-assistance systems.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle system that calculates probabilities of potential maneuvers based on vehicle state variables and contextual variables, adjusting these probabilities using tuning parameters that account for individual driving styles and environmental conditions, and automatically initiates actions based on predicted maneuvers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous vehicle systems use basic maneuver prediction methods, then the system complexity is low, but the prediction reliability is insufficient due to environmental complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuver prediction reliabilityVSAvoidprediction system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The prediction system is segmented into multiple independent probability estimators, each handling specific vehicle state variables (lateral position, longitudinal position, yaw rate, etc.). Each estimator calculates probability for potential maneuvers independently, then results are combined. This modular segmentation improves prediction reliability while managing system complexity through division of labor.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts tuning parameters based on contextual state variables (road conditions, weather, traffic density, driver behavior patterns). The probability calculations are not static but adapt in real-time to changing environmental conditions, enhancing prediction reliability without requiring a permanently complex system structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Measurement precision

If the system considers multiple vehicle state variables and contextual variables, then the prediction accuracy improves, but the computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaneuver prediction accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple vehicle state variables (lateral position, longitudinal position, yaw rate, steering angle, etc.) are processed by separate probability estimators rather than one complex unified model. Each estimator focuses on specific variables, reducing individual computational burden while maintaining overall prediction accuracy through combined results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses tuning parameters that can be adjusted based on contextual variables to optimize the weight and influence of each state variable in probability calculations. This allows the system to adapt computational focus to current conditions, improving accuracy when needed while reducing unnecessary computations in stable conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system uses tuning parameters adapted to individual driving styles, then the prediction reliability for specific drivers improves, but the system adaptability requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver-specific prediction reliabilityVSAvoidsystem adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that observe actual driver maneuvers and adjust tuning parameters accordingly. By continuously monitoring driver behavior patterns and comparing predicted vs. actual maneuvers, the system adapts to individual driving styles over time, improving reliability for each driver while using systematic feedback loops to manage adaptability requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The prediction system automatically adapts to individual drivers through self-adjustment of tuning parameters based on observed behavior patterns, without requiring manual configuration or complex external adaptation mechanisms. The system serves itself by learning from data and automatically optimizing its parameters for each driver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12377841B2Vehicle systems and methods for probabilistic maneuver prediction
Publication Date: 2025.08.05 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US12377841B2 patent drawing
  • US12377841B2 patent drawing
  • US12377841B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Vehicles and related systems and methods are provided for predicting a future maneuver expected to be executed by a driver. One method involves determining a combined probability for a potential maneuver based on constituent probabilities corresponding to different vehicle state variables, and environmental conditions using one or more tuning parameters specific to the respective combination of maneuver and vehicle state variable, determining an adjusted probability for the potential maneuver based at least in part on the combined probability and one or more contextual state variables corresponding to a current operating context for the vehicle, adapted to driver behavior and driving style, identifying the potential maneuver as an expected maneuver to be executed by a driver of the vehicle based on the adjusted probability, and automatically initiating one or more actions in a manner that is influenced by the expected maneuver.