Driver Override Switching in Vehicle Braking Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems fail to adequately consider the transition from driver-operated control to system-overridden control, leading to potential safety issues when a driver's ability is impaired.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control system that includes a control device capable of switching between states where a driver's operation is reflected or not reflected in control, using sensors to detect abnormalities and override driver inputs when necessary, ensuring safe operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the system allows driver override of automated braking, then driver autonomy and ease of operation are improved, but safety is worsened when driver ability is impaired

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver autonomyVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the override capability based on real-time detection of driver abnormality. When the driver is normal, the operator can override the automated braking system. When driver abnormality is detected, the system automatically disables override capability, transitioning from a static permission model to a dynamic one that adapts to the driver's actual state, thereby resolving the contradiction between autonomy and safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a feedback mechanism where the automated braking control device continuously monitors driver state through abnormality detection. Based on this feedback, the system automatically adjusts whether the operator can disable the braking function. This closed-loop control ensures that safety requirements are met while preserving driver autonomy when appropriate, resolving the contradiction between the two opposing needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system overrides driver operation when abnormality is detected, then safety is improved, but driver control and adaptability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddriver control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs dynamic state switching based on detected driver abnormality. In the first state (no abnormality), the control device reflects driver operations. In the second state (abnormality detected), the control device operates independently of driver input. This dynamic adaptation resolves the contradiction by adjusting the level of driver control according to actual safety needs rather than maintaining a fixed control mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the control parameter from 'driver-reflected' to 'driver-independent' based on the detected abnormality state. This parameter switching allows the system to maintain safety through automated control when needed while preserving driver adaptability and control when the driver is capable, thus resolving the contradiction between safety and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If the system switches to automated control without considering operator state, then response speed is improved, but appropriateness and reliability are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speedVSAvoidswitching appropriateness
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary abnormality detection and state assessment before switching control modes. Rather than immediately overriding driver control upon any anomaly, the system first evaluates whether the abnormality actually impacts driving ability. This preliminary assessment ensures that switching to automated control occurs only when appropriate, resolving the contradiction between rapid response and appropriate action.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20250282369A1vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.09.11 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250282369A1 patent drawing
  • US20250282369A1 patent drawing
  • US20250282369A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A vehicle includes: an operator operable by a driver; a control device configured to control a predetermined control target in accordance with an operation of the operator; and a vehicle control device configured to control the control device. The control device has a first state in which an operation of the operator is reflected in control of the control target and a second state in which an operation of the operator is not reflected in control of the control target, and is configured to switch between the first state and the second state, and the vehicle control device includes circuitry configured to: acquire information related to a travel state of the vehicle; and switch the control device from the first state to the second state according to the acquired travel state.