Driver Reward Scoring From Shared Vehicle Operation Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack the ability to assess and incentivize safe driving performance for vehicle operators in shared or rental vehicle contexts, leading to a lack of safe driving incentives and unrewarded safe behavior.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing sensors and processors to collect vehicle operational data, calculate a driving score, and determine eligibility for rewards based on maintaining a threshold rating during temporary associations with vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If vehicle operational data is collected and driving scores are calculated to incentivize safe driving, then driver performance assessment capability is improved, but system complexity increases due to sensors and processing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver performance assessmentVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system integrates multiple functions into a single platform: sensors collect operational data, processors calculate driving scores, and the system manages reward distributions. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require separate systems for data collection, analysis, and incentive management, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The driving score acts as an intermediary metric that translates complex sensor data into a simple, actionable performance indicator. This intermediary layer simplifies the connection between raw operational data and reward determination, making the system more manageable while preserving accurate driver performance assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If driving scores and reward systems are implemented, then driver behavior improvement is enhanced, but implementation cost increases due to infrastructure requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver behavior improvementVSAvoidimplementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables drivers to self-monitor their performance through calculated driving scores and automatically receive rewards based on their behavior. This self-service mechanism reduces the need for manual intervention and oversight, improving driver behavior through autonomous feedback loops while minimizing implementation and operational costs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback by calculating driving scores from operational data and using these scores to determine reward eligibility. This closed-loop feedback mechanism reliably improves driver behavior by providing real-time performance information and tangible incentives, while the automated nature of the feedback reduces implementation costs compared to manual assessment systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor data collection is performed, then driving score accuracy is improved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving score accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant operational data from sensor inputs for driving score calculation, rather than processing all collected data. This selective extraction maintains driving score accuracy by focusing on critical performance indicators while significantly reducing data processing time and computational resource requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system processes a subset of available sensor data that is sufficient for accurate driving score determination, rather than analyzing every piece of collected information. This partial action approach achieves the necessary measurement precision without the excessive processing time that would result from comprehensive data analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS11810139B2Systems and methods for managing and processing vehicle operator accounts based on vehicle operation data
Publication Date: 2023.11.07 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US11810139B2 patent drawing
  • US11810139B2 patent drawing
  • US11810139B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and systems for analyzing vehicle operation data associated with a temporary or periodic usage of a vehicle by a driver. In aspects, the vehicle operation data may be analyzed to assess a performance of the driver during operation of the vehicle. Based on the performance of the driver, the driver may qualify for a reward.