Driver Risk Group Feedback for Safer Community Driving

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers within a community have no effective means to influence or improve the driving behaviors of other drivers, leading to increased vehicle collisions, despite a general desire for safer driving environments.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method and system that classifies vehicle operators into driver risk groups based on shared attributes, analyzes vehicle sensor data to identify safe driving behaviors, and provides incentives to drivers and third parties to promote safe driving practices within these groups.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If drivers are classified into risk groups and provided with feedback on safe driving behaviors, then driver safety awareness and motivation to improve driving behavior is enhanced, but system complexity and data processing requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver safetyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments drivers into distinct risk groups based on their driving behaviors and characteristics. By classifying drivers into different categories (e.g., high-risk, medium-risk, low-risk groups), the system can provide targeted feedback and interventions specific to each group's needs, making the complex task of improving overall driver safety more manageable and effective

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where drivers receive information about their driving behaviors, risk levels, and comparisons with peers in their risk groups. This feedback mechanism motivates drivers to improve their behaviors by showing them concrete examples of safe driving patterns and the impact of their actions on their risk classification

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 3:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that analyzes raw sensor data, determines safe driving behaviors, and translates this information into actionable feedback for drivers. This intermediary layer manages the complexity by handling data processing, behavior analysis, and feedback generation centrally, rather than requiring complex processing in each individual vehicle system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If vehicle sensor data is analyzed to identify safe driving behaviors, then accurate identification of driving patterns is achieved, but data processing time and computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving behavior identification accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of drivers into risk groups based on initial data analysis, establishing baseline categories before detailed behavior analysis is needed. This preliminary action allows the system to have pre-defined frameworks for evaluating different driver types, reducing the computational burden during real-time analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system focuses analysis on key behavioral indicators and critical driving moments rather than processing every single data point in exhaustive detail. By identifying and analyzing only the most significant driving behaviors and patterns, the system achieves sufficient accuracy without requiring excessive processing time and resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Productivity

If drivers are grouped by shared attributes and competed against each other, then community engagement and motivation to drive safely increase, but difficulty in defining and maintaining meaningful groups increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe driving improvement rateVSAvoidgroup classification complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses dynamic parameter changes to define and adjust driver risk groups, allowing classification criteria to evolve based on accumulated data and changing driving patterns. By continuously refining the parameters that define group membership, the system maintains meaningful comparisons while adapting to new behaviors and conditions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The risk group classification system serves multiple functions simultaneously: it segments drivers for targeted feedback, establishes comparison groups for competition, identifies trends for system improvement, and provides a framework for incentive programs. This multi-functionality maximizes the value of the classification process without requiring separate systems for each purpose

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11858519B2System and method of reducing vehicle collisions based on driver risk groups
Publication Date: 2024.01.02 QUANATA LLC
  • US11858519B2 patent drawing
  • US11858519B2 patent drawing
  • US11858519B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for reducing vehicle collisions based on driver risk groups are provided. A plurality of vehicle operators may be classified into a driver risk group based on one or more attributes (e.g., location, workplace, school, demographic, hobby, interest, etc.) shared by the plurality of vehicle operators. Vehicle sensor data (e.g., speed data, acceleration data, braking data, cornering data, following distance data, turn signal data, seatbelt use data, etc.) associated with each of the plurality of vehicle operators of the driver risk group may be analyzed. Based on the analysis of the vehicle sensor data, one or more indicia of safe driving behavior associated with the driver risk group may be identified. In response to a third-party query regarding a vehicle operator in the driver risk group, an indication of the safe driving behavior associated with the driver risk group may be provided to the third party.