Contextual Driver Safety Scoring for Shared Mobility Matching

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shared mobility services face challenges in effectively matching riders with drivers and vehicles due to a lack of data about riders, drivers, and vehicles, especially when new entities join the service, which hampers safe and efficient operation.

Innovation Solution

A computing platform that collects and analyzes data to determine safety scores for drivers and vehicles, using sensor data, audio signals, and wireless signals to detect passenger presence and assess safety, thereby modifying service operations and providing incentives for safe driving.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If shared mobility services operate without comprehensive rider and driver data, then service operation is simpler and faster to start, but effective matching of riders with drivers and vehicles is hampered and safety is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiddata collection and processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting rider and driver data before matching occurs. Background checks, vehicle inspections, and preference profile creation are all completed in advance, allowing the system to have comprehensive safety and matching information ready before a ride request is made, thus improving safety without adding complexity to the moment-of-need operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates digital copies of rider and driver profiles containing preferences, safety information, and historical data. These profile copies are stored and reused for multiple matching operations, eliminating the need to re-collect data for each ride while maintaining comprehensive matching capabilities and improving both safety and operational efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive sensor data is collected during vehicle operation, then safety scoring and passenger detection accuracy is improved, but data processing complexity and computational requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepassenger detection accuracyVSAvoiddata processing system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the relevant subset of sensor data needed for specific purposes. Audio data is extracted and analyzed specifically for passenger detection, while other sensor data is processed for safety scoring. This selective extraction reduces the complexity of processing all raw sensor data while maintaining high detection accuracy for the intended purposes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary processing layer that receives comprehensive sensor data from multiple sources, processes it through standardized algorithms, and outputs structured safety scores and detection results. This intermediary layer simplifies the complexity by providing a uniform processing interface between diverse sensors and the decision-making system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Ease of operation

If safety scores and driver ratings are calculated and used for matching, then rider safety and satisfaction are improved, but the service operation becomes more complex with additional scoring and incentive systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverider-driver matching qualityVSAvoidsafety scoring and incentive system
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service mechanisms where drivers automatically receive safety scores and incentives based on their observed behavior and performance data. The matching system automatically prioritizes highly-rated drivers without requiring manual intervention, and drivers are automatically rewarded for safe driving, reducing operational complexity while improving matching quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes continuous feedback loops where driver behavior is monitored, safety scores are calculated and communicated back to drivers, and matching decisions are adjusted based on performance history. This feedback mechanism improves matching quality by connecting past performance to future opportunities while managing complexity through automated feedback cycles rather than manual processes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11928621B2Controlling vehicles using contextual driver and/or rider data based on automatic passenger detection and mobility status
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US11928621B2 patent drawing
  • US11928621B2 patent drawing
  • US11928621B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system may determine an initial safety prediction for a driver or rider associated with a shared mobility service. Then the system may receive, from various sensors, sensor data collected during operation of a vehicle. The system may determine a subset of the sensor data related to one or more shared mobility statuses, then determine, based on the subset of the sensor data, a safety score for the driver and/or rider. The system may further perform operations based on the safety score and/or the initial safety prediction.