Driver State Monitoring for Dynamic Safe Distance Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous driving systems face challenges in ensuring safety by accurately monitoring driver states and reacting to potential hazards in real-time, particularly in maintaining safe distances from other vehicles based on driver attention levels.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a spatio-temporal analysis modeling scheme using in-vehicle data acquisition devices, such as cameras providing RGB, depth, and infrared data, to recognize driver states and calculate theoretical safe distances, triggering appropriate vehicular actions based on estimated reaction times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If autonomous driving systems use basic driver monitoring, then system complexity is reduced, but safety assurance and reaction time accuracy deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety assuranceVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The driver monitoring system is segmented into multiple independent sensing modalities (RGB camera, depth sensor, infrared camera) that each capture different aspects of driver state. This segmentation allows the system to achieve comprehensive monitoring and high safety assurance while keeping each individual sensor relatively simple and manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from two-dimensional RGB imaging to multi-dimensional sensing by incorporating depth information and infrared thermal data. This dimensional expansion enables more accurate driver state detection and reaction time estimation without proportionally increasing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If multiple data acquisition devices are used to monitor driver states, then measurement precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver state recognition accuracyVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The multiple data acquisition devices (RGB camera, depth sensor, infrared camera) are designed with multi-functionality to monitor various driver states including attention level, drowsiness, and reaction time. This universal approach allows a single integrated system to perform multiple monitoring functions, improving measurement precision while managing device complexity through functional consolidation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple data acquisition devices into a unified monitoring system that processes RGB, depth, and infrared data together. By combining these devices and their data streams into a single integrated system, the patent achieves high measurement precision for driver state recognition while avoiding the complexity of managing separate independent systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If real-time spatio-temporal analysis is performed on multi-modal data, then reaction time estimation accuracy improves, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereaction time estimation accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing of RGB, depth, and infrared data streams separately before combining them for spatio-temporal analysis. By preparing and pre-processing each data modality in advance, the system reduces the computational burden during critical real-time analysis, thereby improving reaction time estimation accuracy without excessive processing delays.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Reliability

If the system calculates theoretical safe distances based on driver reaction times, then safety margin improves, but responsiveness to hazardous situations may decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety marginVSAvoidresponsiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSSpeed

Solution Approach 1:

The theoretical safe distance calculation is made dynamic by continuously updating driver reaction time estimates based on real-time monitoring of driver state changes. This dynamic adjustment allows the safety margin to adapt to current driver conditions, ensuring adequate protection while maintaining responsiveness to hazardous situations through continuous real-time updates rather than static fixed distances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12258016B2Methods and devices for triggering vehicular actions based on passenger actions
Publication Date: 2025.03.25 MOBILEYE VISION TECH LTD
  • US12258016B2 patent drawing
  • US12258016B2 patent drawing
  • US12258016B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Autonomous driving system methods and devices which trigger vehicular actions based on the monitoring of one or more occupants of a vehicle are presented. The methods, and corresponding devices, may include identifying a plurality of features in a plurality of subsets of image data detailing the one or more occupants; tracking changes over time of the plurality of features over the plurality of subsets of image data; determining a state, from a plurality of states, of the one or more occupants based on the tracked changes; and triggering the vehicular action based on the determined state.