Driver-State Warning Scheduling for Hybrid Driving Mode Transitions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems for autonomous and hybrid vehicles lack effective mechanisms for safe mode switching between autonomous and manual driving modes, particularly in situations where the driver's attention or state may pose a risk, and do not adequately address the transition from manual to autonomous modes.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a machine with a processor and communication platform to analyze the driver's state and generate tailored warnings for mode transitions, including determining the necessity of mode changes and scheduling warnings to ensure timely task completion, thereby ensuring safe switching between driving modes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle switches from autonomous mode to manual mode, then the driver takes control of the vehicle, but the driver may not be ready or capable of taking control if they are inattentive or asleep

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of mode switchingVSAvoiddriver readiness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary assessment of driver state before allowing mode switching. Sensors detect driver attentiveness, alertness, and readiness in advance of the mode transition request. The system evaluates whether the driver is capable of taking control before completing the switch from autonomous to manual mode, preventing unsafe transitions when the driver is inattentive or asleep.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the vehicle switches from manual mode to autonomous mode, then the autonomous system takes control, but traditional systems do not adequately address the safety of this transition direction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of mode switchingVSAvoidcoverage of switching scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements a universal mode switching safety mechanism that handles both transition directions (autonomous-to-manual and manual-to-autonomous) through a unified framework. The same driver state assessment and safety evaluation protocols apply regardless of switching direction, ensuring comprehensive coverage of all mode transition scenarios while maintaining adaptable response based on specific conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If the driver is required to complete multiple tasks during mode transition, then the safety of switching is improved, but the time required for transition increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety of mode switchingVSAvoidtransition duration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements periodic checkpoints during mode transition where the driver must demonstrate completion of specific tasks at defined intervals. Rather than requiring all tasks to be completed sequentially before transition begins, the system allows progressive transition with periodic verification, reducing overall transition time while maintaining safety through structured task completion requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS11845379B2Method and system for augmented alerting based on driver's state in hybrid driving
Publication Date: 2023.12.19 PLUSAI INC
  • US11845379B2 patent drawing
  • US11845379B2 patent drawing
  • US11845379B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present teaching relates to generating an alert in a vehicle. First information indicating an upcoming switch in an operating mode of the vehicle is received, which specifies a set of tasks, arranged in an order, to be completed by a driver in the vehicle to achieve the upcoming switch, and a task duration for each of the set of tasks by which the task is to be completed. A current state of the driver is obtained and used to determine a set of warnings to alert the driver to perform the set of tasks. Each warning corresponds to a task in the set of tasks and is created based on the current state of the driver. A warning schedule is generated based on the set of warnings in the order of the set of tasks and transmitted so that warnings in the warning schedule are delivered to the driver.