Driver Supply Control for Ride Sharing Events

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Ride sharing systems struggle to self-regulate driver supply effectively during unusual events, leading to inadequate driver availability despite known demand increases.

Innovation Solution

A system that uses historical data to determine expected driver demand for anomalous events by identifying similar past events and providing incentives to encourage drivers to operate in high-demand areas, such as increased pay or guaranteed rides, to adapt driver supply dynamically.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If the system relies on self-regulating mechanisms for driver supply, then drivers learn profitable times through experience, but the system cannot effectively handle unusual events with sudden demand changes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver supply adaptabilityVSAvoiddriver supply reliability during unusual events
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by identifying expected unusual events in advance and proactively providing driver incentives before the events occur. This allows the system to prepare driver supply ahead of time rather than reacting after demand has already surged, thereby resolving the contradiction between self-regulation and reliability during unusual events

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by monitoring ride request patterns, identifying unusual events, and adjusting incentive levels based on the magnitude of the event. This closed-loop feedback allows the system to adapt driver supply dynamically while maintaining reliability during unexpected demand changes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Quantity of substance

If the system provides incentives to drivers during unusual events, then driver supply increases to meet demand, but operational costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver supply quantityVSAvoidoperational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies partial action by providing incentives to only the portion of drivers needed to meet the excess demand during unusual events, rather than incentivizing all drivers. The incentive level is calibrated to be just sufficient to attract adequate driver supply, thereby minimizing operational cost while still achieving the required driver quantity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes incentive parameters (amount, duration, target regions) based on the specific characteristics of each unusual event. This allows the system to optimize the balance between driver supply quantity and operational cost by adjusting parameters to match the actual demand surge magnitude

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the system identifies and responds to unusual events proactively, then driver supply matches demand during events, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver supply efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system achieves multi-functionality by using a unified event identification and incentive management framework that handles various types of unusual events (weather events, local events, large-scale events) through the same core mechanisms. This universal approach improves productivity without proportionally increasing system complexity, as the same infrastructure serves multiple event types

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS20230385978A1Driver supply control
Publication Date: 2023.11.30 LYFT INC
  • US20230385978A1 patent drawing
  • US20230385978A1 patent drawing
  • US20230385978A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for supply control includes an input interface and a processor. The input interface is to receive an indication of an expected event. The processor is to determine a historic event similar to the expected event, determine an expected driver demand for the expected event based at least in part on the similar historic event, and determine one or more incentives to meet the expected driver demand.