Driver Takeover Alerts for Complex Autonomous Road Conditions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous driving systems face challenges in complex situations, such as pedestrians or obstacles, where they cannot provide timely alerts for manual vehicle control, leading to sub-optimal driving decisions.

Innovation Solution

A driver alert component acquires sensor data from on-board vehicle sensors and evaluates driving conditions, determining if a complexity threshold is exceeded, and generates alerts for the driver to assume manual control, considering cognitive load and timing, with the help of a driving condition aggregator that processes data from multiple vehicles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the autonomous driving system operates fully autonomously without driver alerts, then the driver can perform other tasks (eating, working, conversing), but the system cannot provide timely alerts for complex situations leading to sub-optimal driving decisions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver task performanceVSAvoiddriving decision quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces a driver alert notification system as an intermediary between the autonomous driving system and the driver. This mediator monitors complex driving situations and selectively alerts the driver when human intervention would improve decision-making, allowing the driver to remain engaged without constant manual control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the level of driver involvement based on situation complexity. Rather than fixed autonomous or manual modes, the system transitions between states by providing timed alerts that adapt to real-time driving conditions, cognitive load assessments, and route characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If the system provides driver alerts for all complex situations, then driving decision quality improves, but the driver may experience alert fatigue or cognitive overload

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving decision qualityVSAvoiddriver cognitive load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different alert strategies based on local situation characteristics. Rather than uniform alerting, it tailors notifications to specific driving contexts, driver states, and situation urgencies, providing targeted alerts only where human judgment adds value.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes multiple parameters including alert timing, notification method, and intensity based on assessed driver cognitive load and situation complexity. It adjusts the alert strategy dynamically by modifying these parameters to optimize both safety and driver comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Loss of time

If the system calculates alert timing based on distance to road segment, then adequate response time is provided, but the alert may be too early or too late depending on driver reaction variability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver response timeVSAvoidalert timing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates feedback loops that continuously assess driver state, cognitive load, and reaction patterns. This feedback enables real-time adjustment of alert timing to match actual driver responsiveness rather than relying solely on predetermined distance-based calculations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of driver cognitive load and situation complexity before issuing alerts. By evaluating these factors in advance, it can pre-calculate optimal alert timing that accounts for individual driver characteristics and current mental state.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11738768B2Manual vehicle control notification
Publication Date: 2023.08.29 INRIX INC
  • US11738768B2 patent drawing
  • US11738768B2 patent drawing
  • US11738768B2 patent drawing

AI summary

One or more techniques and/or systems are provided for notifying drivers to assume manual vehicle control of vehicles. For example, sensor data is acquired from on-board vehicles sensors (e.g., radar, sonar, and/or camera imagery of a crosswalk) of a vehicle that is in an autonomous driving mode. In an example, the sensor data is augmented with driving condition data aggregated from vehicle sensor data of other vehicles (e.g., a cloud service collects and aggregates vehicle sensor data from vehicles within the crosswalk to identify and provide the driving condition data to the vehicle). The sensor data (e.g., augmented sensor data) is evaluated to identify a driving condition of a road segment, such as the crosswalk (e.g., pedestrians protesting within the crosswalk). Responsive to the driving condition exceeding a complexity threshold for autonomous driving decision making functionality, a driver alert to assume manual vehicle control may be provided to a driver.