Driver Update Inhibition via Failure Correlation Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driver update systems often cause system failures on older platforms due to unforeseen hardware-software incompatibilities, leading to data loss and user frustration, as they are typically tested only on newer platforms and rely on reactive user feedback for banning problematic drivers.

Innovation Solution

A system that monitors driver installations and system failures across multiple platforms, using a smart driver update model to proactively identify and inhibit the installation of drivers likely to cause failures by analyzing correlations and statistical data, thereby reducing the need for user-initiated technical support.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the latest driver updates are recommended to all users, then driver functionality and performance are improved, but system stability deteriorates due to hardware-software incompatibilities on older platforms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem stabilityVSAvoiddriver compatibility across platforms
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by proactively monitoring and analyzing driver installation data and system failure reports before recommending updates. It identifies drivers likely to cause failures through correlation analysis and inhibits their recommendation in advance, preventing system failures before they occur rather than reacting after users report issues

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops by collecting system failure reports from multiple computing devices, analyzing correlation between driver installations and failures, and using this feedback to dynamically adjust driver update recommendations. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the system to learn from actual platform performance and adapt recommendations accordingly

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Adaptability or versatility

If driver updates are tested extensively on multiple platforms before deployment, then driver compatibility is improved, but the time and resources required for testing increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver compatibilityVSAvoidtesting duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by allowing real computing devices to serve as test platforms through voluntary participation in data collection. Users opt-in to share driver installation and system failure data, eliminating the need for centralized extensive testing. The collective data from many devices provides comprehensive platform coverage without requiring dedicated testing resources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges testing efforts across multiple real-world computing devices by collecting and analyzing aggregated data from diverse platforms. Instead of isolating testing to controlled environments, it combines observations from actual user devices running different configurations, creating a distributed testing network that achieves broader compatibility validation more efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors and analyzes driver installation data from multiple platforms, then accuracy in identifying problematic drivers is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefailure correlation accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses an intermediary approach by collecting standardized data from multiple platforms through a common data collection interface and processing it through centralized correlation analysis. This intermediary layer harmonizes diverse platform data formats and simplifies the complexity of multi-platform monitoring while maintaining measurement precision through systematic data aggregation and analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11886296B2Inhibiting recommendation of driver installations for drivers that are likely to cause a system failure
Publication Date: 2024.01.30 DELL PROD LP
  • US11886296B2 patent drawing
  • US11886296B2 patent drawing
  • US11886296B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus comprises a processing device that is configured to obtain information about driver installations of a given driver on a plurality of computing devices and to obtain information about system failures from the plurality of computing devices. The processing device is further configured to determine a correlation between the driver installations and the system failures and to determine that the given driver is likely to cause a system failure based at least in part on the determined correlation between the driver installations and the system failures. The processing device is further configured to provide an indication that the given driver is likely to cause a system failure to a given computing device. The indication is configured to cause the given computing device to inhibit a presentation of a recommendation to install the given driver to a user of the given computing device.