Driver Urgency Scoring With Context-Aware Anomaly Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for determining driver urgency in vehicles lack accuracy and reliability due to insufficient consideration of contextual information, leading to suboptimal classification of driving behavior.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that fetches ego vehicle dynamic data and contextual information, generates a feature vector, classifies it using supervised or unsupervised algorithms, and determines an urgency score by tracking anomalies, incorporating factors like road congestion, lane changes, and weather data to enhance accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If contextual information is not considered in urgency detection, then the system complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision of driver urgency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveurgency detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the feature vector into multiple components: vehicle dynamic data (speed, acceleration, jerk), contextual information data (congestion, weather, road conditions), and behavioral patterns. This segmentation allows the system to process and evaluate each component separately while maintaining overall accuracy, resolving the contradiction between measurement precision and system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from analyzing single-dimensional driving parameters to multi-dimensional analysis by incorporating contextual information across different dimensions (environmental, vehicular, behavioral). This dimensional expansion enables more accurate urgency detection while the modular architecture manages the resulting complexity through structured data organization and processing pipelines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If multiple data sources are integrated for urgency detection, then the reliability of classification improves, but the loss of information processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclassification reliabilityVSAvoidinformation processing load
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the most relevant features from multiple data sources through the feature vector construction process. By selecting and extracting key parameters (speed, acceleration, jerk, congestion level, weather conditions) rather than processing all raw data, the system maintains classification reliability while reducing information processing load and preventing information loss.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system transforms raw data from multiple sources into standardized parameters within a unified feature vector. This parameter transformation allows different data sources to be integrated effectively while managing processing complexity, maintaining reliability through consistent parameter representation across all input sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If real-time contextual data is processed, then the detection speed is improved, but the use of energy increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection speedVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system processes data at different levels of detail based on situational requirements. For normal driving conditions, it uses partial processing with lower computational demand, while activating full real-time processing only when urgency indicators are detected or contextual conditions warrant heightened monitoring. This approach maintains detection speed when needed while reducing energy consumption during routine operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS20250206295A1Computer-implemented method for determining urgency in a driver of a vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.06.26 CONTINENTAL AUTOMOTIVE TECHNOLOGIES GMBH
  • US20250206295A1 patent drawing
  • US20250206295A1 patent drawing
  • US20250206295A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention proposes a computer-implemented method for determining an urgency score of a driver (12) of a ego vehicle (10) based on contextual information data (26), the method comprising: a) fetching vehicle dynamic data (24) that are indicative of at least one quantity related to the motion of the ego vehicle (10); b) fetching contextual information data (26) that are indicative of at least one property external to the ego vehicle (10); c) generating a feature vector from the vehicle dynamic data (24) and the contextual information data (26); d) classifying the feature vector into an urgency class or a non-urgency class and tracking the amount of occurrences of the urgency class with an anomaly counter; and e) determining an urgency score based on the value of the anomaly counter.