Driverless Traffic Management Vehicle With Deployable Impact Attenuator

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current roadside traffic management vehicles lack efficient driverless operation modes and integrated impact attenuation systems that can automatically adjust to different scenarios, such as speed and obstacle detection, limiting their autonomous functionality and safety.

Innovation Solution

A driverless traffic management vehicle equipped with a control system that includes a controller for multiple operation modes (follow, remote-control, and autonomous) and an impact attenuator, which can be automatically deployed or stowed based on speed and verge offset, using sensors and electronic signage for navigation and collision avoidance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If driverless operation modes are added to traffic management vehicles, then autonomous functionality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous functionalityVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control system is segmented into multiple independent mode controllers (follow mode controller, remote-control mode controller, autonomous control mode controller), each handling specific driverless operation modes. This modular segmentation allows the system to achieve high autonomous functionality while managing complexity through divided responsibilities among controllers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is designed with multi-functional capability to handle multiple driverless operation modes (following lead vehicle, remote control, autonomous navigation). This universal design allows a single control system to perform diverse autonomous functions, improving automation extent while avoiding the need for separate dedicated systems for each mode.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If impact attenuator is integrated with electronic signage board, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidvehicle structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The impact attenuator and electronic signage board are merged into a single integrated rear assembly. The signage board is positioned on the rear surface of the attenuator, allowing both safety function (impact attenuation) and communication function (electronic signage) to be combined in one structure, improving safety while minimizing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rear assembly serves multiple functions: the impact attenuator provides collision safety, while the integrated electronic signage board provides traffic management communication. This multi-functional design achieves both safety and information dissemination without requiring separate dedicated structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If attenuator is made pivotally coupled for deployment, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveattenuator configuration flexibilityVSAvoidattenuator mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The attenuator is designed with pivotal coupling that allows it to dynamically change between deployed and stowed configurations. This dynamic capability enables the attenuator to adapt to different operational scenarios (deployed for safety, stowed for signage visibility), improving versatility while using a relatively simple rotational mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The attenuator can be pre-positioned in deployed or stowed configuration based on anticipated operational needs. The pivotal coupling mechanism allows preliminary preparation of the attenuator state before actual use, enabling the system to adapt to different scenarios by pre-configuring the appropriate attenuator position.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Loss of information

If multiple signage boards are provided on the vehicle, then communication effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication effectivenessVSAvoidsignage system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Electronic signage boards are strategically positioned at different locations on the vehicle (rear surface of attenuator, front surface, hoist). Each signage board serves a specific local communication function optimized for its position, improving overall communication effectiveness while distributing the signage system across multiple locations rather than using a single complex display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The signage system utilizes multiple spatial dimensions and surfaces (rear, front, elevated hoist position) to distribute information display. By exploiting the three-dimensional space around the vehicle, the system achieves comprehensive communication coverage without requiring a single large complex signage structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentUS11879219B2Driverless impact attenuating traffic management vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.01.23 BOYLE NORMAN
  • US11879219B2 patent drawing
  • US11879219B2 patent drawing
  • US11879219B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driverless traffic management vehicle has a control system having a controller interfacing steering and drive interfaces for control of respective steering and drive subsystems of the vehicle. The vehicle also has an impact attenuator and actuator therefor for configuring the attenuator in deployed and stowed configurations. The control system comprises at least one driverless mode controller operably controlling the steering and drive interfaces for controlling the vehicle in at least one of follow mode, remote-control and autonomous driverless mode of operation. To control traffic, the vehicle may be driven to a roadside location and set in the at least one driverless mode of operation to control the steering and drive interfaces accordingly.