Vehicle Drivetrain Capacity Mapping Across Mission Stages

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing vehicle control systems face disruptions in productivity due to malfunctions, as responses to drivetrain malfunctions can negatively impact both the affected vehicle and others in a site or transport system, leading to reduced productivity.

Innovation Solution

A method for controlling vehicles that involves collecting operational data on drivetrain components and environmental conditions, determining propulsive capacity in different operational areas, and mapping these capacities to expected mission stages to adjust vehicle control strategies, allowing for continued operation with reduced capacity in non-critical areas.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If evasive maneuvering is implemented in response to drivetrain malfunction, then vehicle safety is improved, but productivity is reduced due to mission disruption

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevehicle safetyVSAvoidmission completion
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The drivetrain operational areas are segmented into multiple distinct regions (e.g., first operational area, second operational area, third operational area) with different propulsive capacity characteristics. This segmentation allows the control system to evaluate malfunctions area-specifically rather than triggering blanket evasive maneuvers, enabling continued operation in non-critical areas while maintaining safety in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by assessing the impact of drivetrain malfunction locally within specific operational areas rather than globally across the entire drivetrain. The control system determines whether the malfunction affects critical operational areas (requiring evasive maneuvers) or non-critical areas (allowing continued operation), thus preserving productivity while ensuring safety where needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Reliability

If drivetrain component de-rate is implemented to ensure safety, then reliability is improved, but propulsive capacity is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrivetrain safetyVSAvoidpropulsive capacity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic de-rate strategies where the propulsive capacity reduction is adjusted in real-time based on the severity and location of the malfunction. The control system continuously monitors operational data and dynamically modifies the de-rate level across different operational areas, allowing maximum power in non-affected areas while applying protective de-rate only where necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters (propulsive capacity limits) based on the detected malfunction characteristics. By identifying which operational areas are affected and to what extent, the control system adjusts the propulsive capacity parameters selectively, maintaining full capacity in safe operational areas while reducing capacity only in areas where the malfunction poses a risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive operational data collection is performed to assess drivetrain status, then measurement precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrivetrain status detectionVSAvoiddata collection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts only the most critical operational data elements needed for drivetrain status assessment rather than collecting all possible data. The control system identifies and extracts key parameters related to propulsive capacity in different operational areas, filtering out redundant information and focusing on data that directly impacts safety and productivity decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary assessment of operational data to determine the overall drivetrain status before initiating detailed analysis. By pre-evaluating data quality and relevance, the control system can decide whether comprehensive data collection is necessary or if a simplified assessment suffices, thereby reducing unnecessary system complexity while maintaining measurement precision when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11891066B2Method for controlling a vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.02.06 VOLVO TRUCK CORP
  • US11891066B2 patent drawing
  • US11891066B2 patent drawing
  • US11891066B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention provides a method for controlling a vehicle (1) comprising a drivetrain comprising at least one drive device (2) adapted to generate mechanical power, the method comprising—controlling the vehicle to perform a mission comprising a plurality of stages (MS1-MS12), —collecting operational data relevant to the operation of the drivetrain, wherein the operational data indicate a de-rate of a component of the drivetrain, a fault of a component of the drivetrain, and/or an environmental condition which influences the drivetrain operation, —determining an expected mission stage (MS1-MS12), —determining, in dependence on the operational data, the propulsive capacity (CA1-CA3) in at least two different operational areas (A1-A3) of the drive device (2), —mapping the operational area propulsive capacities (CA1-CA3) to the expected mission stage (MS1-MS12), and —controlling the vehicle (1) in dependence on said mapping.