Drivetrain Duty Cycle Recording for Damage Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

There is a lack of comprehensive and accurate off-highway vehicle drivetrain duty cycle information, leading to overdesign and over-testing, as well as challenges in estimating the remaining life of drivetrain components due to high costs and limitations in data collection from experimental machines and customer-owned vehicles.

Innovation Solution

A duty cycle recording system with onboard sensors and an electronic control unit that collects and processes drivetrain data, including three-dimensional histogram data of torques and speeds, to compute damage and remaining life estimates for drivetrain components, which are then wirelessly transmitted for real-time monitoring and maintenance planning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If experimental machines are used to collect duty cycle data, then data can be obtained, but the cost of production, operation, and instrumentation is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduty cycle dataVSAvoidcost
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses the vehicle's own onboard sensors and electronic control units to collect and process duty cycle data, eliminating the need for separate experimental test machines and external instrumentation. The vehicle serves itself by utilizing its existing diagnostic capabilities to gather the required operational data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of using physical experimental test machines, the system creates a digital copy of duty cycle data through onboard sensors and processors. This virtual replication of test data collection eliminates the need for expensive physical test setups while providing equivalent information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Quantity of substance

If the number of experimental machines is low and test periods are brief, then costs are reduced, but the quantity and breadth of data are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovecostVSAvoiddata quantity and breadth
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously collects duty cycle data during normal vehicle operation over extended periods, rather than relying on brief test periods. The onboard sensors continuously monitor drivetrain parameters, accumulating comprehensive data throughout the vehicle's service life, which greatly increases both the quantity and breadth of available information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

3Loss of information

If data is collected from customer-owned machines with past instrumentation, then more data can be obtained, but the process is difficult and costly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveduty cycle dataVSAvoiddata collection system
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses universal onboard sensors and electronic control units that are already present in modern vehicles for multiple purposes, including duty cycle data collection. This multi-functional approach eliminates the need for separate specialized instrumentation, simplifying the data collection system while enabling comprehensive data gathering from customer-owned machines.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If drivetrains are overdesigned and over-tested, then reliability is improved, but manufacturing costs and testing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrivetrain reliabilityVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses actual duty cycle data collected from operational vehicles to provide feedback on real-world drivetrain performance and stress conditions. This feedback enables targeted design improvements and validation testing based on actual usage patterns, replacing extensive trial-and-error testing with data-driven design optimization that reduces both time and cost while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9558600B2Duty cycle recording system and method for estimation of damage and remaining life of drivetrain components
Publication Date: 2017.01.31 DEERE & CO
  • US9558600B2 patent drawing
  • US9558600B2 patent drawing
  • US9558600B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A duty cycle recording system and method is disclosed for a vehicle with a drivetrain having a plurality of components and sensors. The duty cycle recording system may include a control unit and communication link. The control unit may receive sensor readings, compute damage estimates for drivetrain components based on the readings, and compute estimated remaining life (ERL) estimates based on the damage estimates. The communication link may transmit the computed damage and ERL estimates. The control unit may sample transmission torque and speed sensor readings, and for each sample may populate a three-dimensional histogram of transmission torque and speed the vehicle has experienced.