Driving-Optimized App Features for Hazardous Event Correlation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Smartphone usage in vehicles can lead to accidents due to driver distraction, and users may be unaware of the safety risks associated with certain application features, as they lack effective means to gauge their driving habits and the impact of application interactions on their safety.

Innovation Solution

Implementing driving-optimized application features that suggest alternative behaviors or disable non-driving-optimized features based on detected vehicle events and sensor data, using computing devices to correlate application interactions with hazardous driving events and provide users with data to encourage safer habits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vehicle-optimized applications and devices are implemented to mitigate accident risk, then safety is improved, but user apprehension and resistance to adoption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoiduser adoption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides objective feedback to users by presenting data that correlates their application usage with driving events. Users receive information about their own driving patterns and how specific applications may have influenced them, allowing them to make informed decisions about their usage habits without feeling controlled or monitored in a punitive way.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

Users are empowered to independently review their own driving data and draw their own conclusions about their habits. The system provides the tools and information for users to self-diagnose their driving behaviors and make their own decisions about which applications to use or avoid, rather than imposing restrictions from above.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Loss of information

If users are provided with subjective assessments of their driving habits, then awareness of safety risks is improved, but users remain ineffective at accurately gauging their actual driving behavior and the impact of application features

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety awarenessVSAvoidself-assessment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces subjective human self-assessment with objective sensor-based measurement. Instead of relying on users' imperfect memories and self-perceptions of their driving habits, the system uses accelerometers, gyroscopes, and other sensors to automatically detect and record actual driving events, providing precise quantitative data about braking patterns, lane changes, and other maneuvers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an intermediary layer of objective measurement and analysis between the user and their driving behavior. Rather than users directly observing and interpreting their own habits (which is prone to bias and error), the system acts as an impartial mediator that collects sensor data, correlates it with application usage, and presents findings to the user in an easily understandable format.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If non-driving-optimized application features are disabled to reduce distraction, then accident risk is reduced, but user convenience and access to full application functionality are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidapplication functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts application functionality based on real-time driving conditions and learned user patterns. Rather than statically disabling features, the system can temporarily restrict certain functions during detected driving events while maintaining full functionality when the vehicle is stationary or the user is not driving, allowing users to access complete application capabilities when safe and appropriate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different levels of restriction to different application features based on their specific distraction potential and the context of usage. Rather than uniformly disabling all non-essential functions, the system selectively limits only those features that pose the greatest safety risk during driving while preserving access to other application functions that may be useful or necessary, tailoring the restriction strategy to the specific application and usage scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11801750B2Adaptation(s) based on correlating hazardous vehicle events with application feature(s)
Publication Date: 2023.10.31 GOOGLE LLC
  • US11801750B2 patent drawing
  • US11801750B2 patent drawing
  • US11801750B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for detecting hazardous vehicle events and encouraging usage of driving optimized application features to mitigate occurrence of the hazardous vehicle events. The driving optimized application features can address unsafe driving events that are determined to be correlated with certain distracting application features. For example, an application of a computing device can determine that a user is occupying a vehicle and is driving toward a destination. While driving, data available to the application can indicate that an unsafe driving event, such as a hard braking event, has occurred while the user was interacting with another application. Thereafter, and based on this data, the application can render an output characterizing the correlation between the hard braking event and the other application, and/or provide the user with an option to interact with the other application via driving optimized feature(s).