Driving Assistance Shadow Mode for Data-Backed Feature Upgrades

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for autonomous and semi-autonomous motor vehicle operation lack efficiency in upgrading and testing driving assistance systems, failing to effectively communicate potential benefits of new hardware and software versions to users.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that operates a driving assistance system in a 'shadow mode' with a second version of hardware and/or software, comparing real and virtual operating data to inform drivers of advantages and offering on-demand upgrades, including features like freeway pilot, park assistant, and enhanced emergency brake assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a second version of hardware and/or software is operated in shadow mode for testing purposes, then the reliability of the driving assistance system is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of driving assistance systemVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the driving assistance system running in shadow mode with a second version of hardware and/or software. This copy processes the same sensor data in parallel without interfering with the real system, allowing safe testing and comparison while maintaining system reliability without permanently increasing physical device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The second version of the driving assistance system is prepared and tested in advance in shadow mode before being deployed to the real system. This preliminary testing allows potential issues to be identified and resolved beforehand, improving reliability while avoiding the need for complex real-time testing mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Loss of information

If real operating data is collected and compared with virtual operating data, then the information quality for decision-making is improved, but the loss of time for data processing increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinformation qualityVSAvoidtime for data processing
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The shadow mode system continuously processes sensor data in parallel with the real system without interruption. Data collection and comparison occur continuously during normal operation, eliminating the need for separate testing phases and reducing overall time loss while maintaining high information quality through continuous real-world data gathering

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces complex physical testing mechanisms with virtual simulation and data comparison. Instead of physically testing new hardware/software versions, the system uses computational processing to compare virtual operating data with real data, significantly reducing processing time while maintaining information quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If the driving assistance system offers on-demand activation of specific functions, then the ease of operation is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts its configuration by allowing on-demand activation of specific functions. The driving assistance system can change its operational state based on user needs, enabling or disabling particular features as required. This dynamic adaptability improves ease of operation without requiring permanent complex hardware configurations for all possible functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Productivity

If the second version of hardware and/or software includes additional or improved functions, then the productivity of the driving assistance system is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity of driving assistance systemVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the driving assistance system into modular functional units. The second version contains additional or improved functions organized as separate modules that can be independently activated. This segmentation allows the system to provide enhanced productivity through selective function activation without requiring all functions to be permanently integrated, thus managing device complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS20240246556A1Method, system and computer program product for autonomously or semi-autonomously operating a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2024.07.25 DR ING H C F PORSCHE AG
  • US20240246556A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for autonomously or semi-autonomously operating a motor vehicle using a DAS (driving assistance system) that is operated in real terms with a first hardware version and/or software version (20). Real operating data (12) are recorded during operation of the DAS with the first hardware version and/or software version and also are recorded during operation of the motor vehicle by the driver with or without assistance from the DAS. The DAS is operated virtually in a shadow mode (9) with at least a second hardware version and/or software version. Virtual operating data are determined during operation of the DAS with the second hardware version and/or software version. Real operating data (12) are compared with virtual operating data, and the result of the comparison is used to make the driver aware of the advantages of switching from the first (20) to the second hardware version and/or software version.