Driving Assistance Deceleration Control for Traffic Signal Misreads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driving assistance systems may cause inappropriate re-acceleration of vehicles when they incorrectly recognize traffic light states, leading to unsafe driving conditions.

Innovation Solution

A driving assistance system that executes deceleration control based on the distance to a specific area, which can be in a crossing allowable or prohibited state, and only stops deceleration control when a user-provided crossing instruction is received, ensuring accurate state information and reliability thresholds are met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the driving assistance system automatically stops deceleration control when state information indicates a crossing allowable state, then the system responds quickly to traffic light changes, but inappropriate re-acceleration occurs when state information is incorrect

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse speed to traffic light changesVSAvoidaccuracy of deceleration control stopping decision
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces feedback by continuously monitoring both state information and user operations. The processor determines whether to stop deceleration control not only based on state information indicating a crossing allowable state but also by checking whether a crossing operation has been detected from the user. This feedback loop ensures that automatic stopping only occurs when both conditions are met, preventing inappropriate re-acceleration while maintaining responsive control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If the system requires user crossing operation to stop deceleration control, then safety is improved by confirming user intent, but response time increases when user input is delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of deceleration control stopping decisionVSAvoidtime delay in stopping deceleration control
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by continuously detecting user operations during the deceleration process. Rather than waiting for explicit user input after the traffic light changes, the processor monitors for crossing operations in real-time and is ready to immediately stop deceleration control when both the state information indicates a crossing allowable state and the user operation is detected. This reduces effective response time while maintaining safety requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If the system uses automated deceleration control based on traffic light state, then driving assistance efficiency is improved, but user control is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving assistance efficiencyVSAvoiduser control over vehicle deceleration
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamics by making the deceleration control adaptable based on user behavior. The processor continuously evaluates whether a crossing operation has been detected and adjusts the stopping decision accordingly. When the user performs a crossing operation, the system transitions from fully automated control to user-initiated control, allowing the control mode to dynamically change based on real-time user input while maintaining overall assistance efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20250026345A1Driving assistance system, driving assistance device, driving assistance method, and storage medium storing driving assistance program
Publication Date: 2025.01.23 DENSO CORP
  • US20250026345A1 patent drawing
  • US20250026345A1 patent drawing
  • US20250026345A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving assistance system includes a processor configured to cause the system to execute deceleration control according to a distance from a vehicle to a specific area which is switchable between a crossing allowable state and a crossing prohibited state, obtain state information for the specific area, obtain a crossing instruction of a vehicle user that instructs the vehicle to cross the specific area, stop the deceleration control in response to the obtaining of the crossing instruction when the state information indicates the crossing allowable state, prohibit the deceleration control from stopping until the obtaining of the crossing instruction even during the crossing allowable state, and stop the deceleration control before the obtaining of the crossing instruction when a reliability of the state information falling within an acceptable range, even during the crossing allowable state.