Driving Behavior Prediction Using Merged Template Weighting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driving behavior prediction systems face challenges in accurately predicting driver behavior due to intra-individual differences in driving data, leading to reduced prediction accuracy and reliability.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that acquire position and route information, determine distances to object points, and use driving data to predict behavior based on templates and weighting factors, updating these factors to reflect actual driving behavior and improve prediction accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If model learning is conducted based only on driving data showing driving behaviors of the driver of the own vehicle, then the system can be simplified and data collection becomes easier, but the prediction accuracy deteriorates due to intra-individual differences in driving data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel learning system complexityVSAvoiddriving behavior prediction accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple data sources including driving data from the own vehicle, other vehicles, and simulation results to create a comprehensive training dataset. This combination allows the model to learn from diverse driving patterns while accounting for intra-individual differences, thereby improving prediction accuracy without requiring an overly complex system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The trained behavior recognition model is designed to be universally applicable across multiple vehicles and drivers. By training on aggregated data from various sources, a single model can accurately predict driving behaviors for different individuals, eliminating the need for separate models for each vehicle-driver combination and simplifying the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If models are generated based on plural driving data to make the apparatus compatible with various drivers, then adaptability improves, but the system complexity increases and requires extensive data collection infrastructure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility with various driversVSAvoidmodel generation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal behavior recognition model that can adapt to various drivers through training on aggregated driving data from multiple sources. This single multi-functional model replaces the need for multiple driver-specific models, achieving compatibility with various drivers while maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary training using aggregated driving data from multiple vehicles and simulation environments before deployment. This pre-training phase establishes a robust baseline model that can then be fine-tuned or directly applied to individual vehicles, reducing the complexity of real-time adaptation and enabling versatile driver compatibility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Measurement precision

If individual driver-specific models are generated to accurately predict each driver's behavior, then prediction accuracy improves, but the data collection and processing requirements increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindividual driver behavior prediction accuracyVSAvoiddriving data volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines driving data from multiple vehicles, drivers, and simulation environments into a unified training dataset. This merging approach allows the system to learn common driving behavior patterns across individuals while capturing individual variations, achieving accurate predictions without requiring exhaustive data collection for each specific driver.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses simulation environments to generate synthetic driving data that complements real-world data. This self-service approach to data generation reduces the burden of collecting extensive real driving data while still providing sufficient training material for accurate individual behavior prediction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS7805240B2Driving behavior prediction method and apparatus
Publication Date: 2010.09.28 DENSO CORP
  • US7805240B2 patent drawing
  • US7805240B2 patent drawing
  • US7805240B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving behavior prediction apparatus includes, for accurately predicting a driving behavior, a position calculation unit for a subject vehicle position calculation, a route setting unit for setting a navigation route, a distance calculation unit for calculating a distance to a nearest object point, a parameter storage unit for storing a template weighting factor that reflects a driving operation tendency of a driver, a driving behavior prediction unit for predicting a driver's behavior based on vehicle information and the template weighting factor, a driving behavior recognition unit for recognizing driver's behavior at the object point, and a driving behavior learning unit for updating the template weighting factor so as to study the driving operation tendency of the driver in a case that a prediction result by the driving behavior prediction unit agrees with a recognition result by the driving behavior recognition unit.