Individualized Driving Behavior Prediction for Proactive Vehicle Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous and manually-driven vehicles rely on real-time sensor data for operational decisions, which can be suboptimal due to the reactive nature of their responses to unexpected driving behaviors of nearby vehicles, limiting their reaction time and options.

Innovation Solution

Equipping vehicles with sensors to collect and aggregate past driving behavior data of nearby vehicles, using machine-learning models to predict their future behaviors based on contextual data, allowing for proactive operational decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If vehicles rely on real-time sensor data for operational decisions, then the vehicle can operate safely with current information, but the reaction time is limited and responses are reactive rather than proactive

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting and analyzing historical driving behavior data of nearby vehicles before critical events occur. Machine learning models predict future driving behaviors based on this historical data, allowing the vehicle to prepare proactive responses in advance, thus reducing reaction time while maintaining safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring actual driving behaviors of nearby vehicles and comparing them with predicted behaviors. This feedback loop refines the machine learning models over time, improving prediction accuracy and enabling more effective proactive decision-making while ensuring safety through validated behavioral patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If vehicles use generalized assumptions about driving behavior, then the system complexity is reduced, but the ability to respond to unexpected individual behaviors is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidresponse to unexpected behaviors
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by creating individualized driving behavior models for each nearby vehicle based on their specific historical data, rather than using uniform generalized assumptions. This allows the system to adapt to each vehicle's unique driving patterns and unexpected behaviors while maintaining manageable complexity through targeted data collection and modeling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system utilizes parameter changes by dynamically adjusting prediction parameters based on the specific characteristics of each nearby vehicle's historical behavior data. The machine learning models modify their parameters to reflect individual driving styles, enabling the system to handle diverse and unexpected behaviors while keeping the overall framework relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11077850B2Systems and methods for determining individualized driving behaviors of vehicles
Publication Date: 2021.08.03 LYFT INC
  • US11077850B2 patent drawing
  • US11077850B2 patent drawing
  • US11077850B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a computing system of a vehicle may capture, using one or more sensors of the vehicle, sensor data associated with a first vehicle of interest. The computing system may identify one or more features associated with the first vehicle of interest based on the sensor data. The computing system may determine a driving behavior model associated with the first vehicle of interest based on the one or more features of the first vehicle of interest. The computing system may predict a driving behavior of the first vehicle of interest based on at least the determined driving behavior model. The computing system may determine a vehicle operation for the vehicle based on at least the predicted driving behavior of the first vehicle of interest.