Driving Behavior Evaluation Using Surrounding Vehicle Speed Deviation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing driving behavior evaluation technologies do not consider traffic flow and surrounding vehicles, leading to driver discomfort during evaluations.

Innovation Solution

A driving behavior evaluation system that sets a lower evaluation for vehicles exceeding speed limits if the speed deviation from surrounding vehicles exceeds a threshold value, with adjustable threshold values based on traffic volume, area, and time of day.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the evaluation strictly penalizes speed limit violations without considering surrounding traffic, then speed regulation compliance is improved, but driver comfort and acceptance deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed regulation complianceVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the evaluation parameters by introducing contextual factors (surrounding vehicle speeds, traffic flow conditions) to modify how speed violations are assessed. Instead of a fixed penalty for exceeding speed limits, the system dynamically adjusts evaluation based on relative speed deviations and traffic conditions, resolving the contradiction between strict compliance and driver comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation system transitions from a static, rule-based approach to a dynamic, context-aware assessment. The system continuously monitors surrounding vehicle speeds and adjusts the evaluation criteria in real-time, allowing flexible response to varying traffic conditions while maintaining speed regulation objectives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the evaluation considers surrounding vehicle speeds and traffic flow, then driver comfort is improved, but evaluation complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver comfortVSAvoidevaluation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system introduces an intermediary evaluation layer that processes raw speed data from multiple vehicles and transforms it into a contextualized assessment. This intermediary layer calculates average speeds, determines deviations, and applies evaluation rules based on pre-defined thresholds, simplifying the complexity while maintaining comprehensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent manages complexity by changing parameters into standardized metrics (speed deviations, threshold comparisons). Instead of analyzing complex traffic patterns directly, the system evaluates simplified parameters like relative speed differences and predefined threshold violations, making the evaluation process more manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a fixed threshold is used for speed deviation evaluation, then evaluation simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different traffic conditions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation simplicityVSAvoidtraffic condition adaptability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic threshold adjustment based on traffic conditions. Instead of using a single fixed threshold for all situations, the evaluation thresholds adapt to different traffic scenarios (e.g., congestion, free-flow conditions), allowing the system to maintain simplicity while improving adaptability to varying traffic environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different evaluation thresholds and criteria for different local conditions (urban areas, highways, congestion levels). Each traffic environment receives customized evaluation parameters appropriate to its characteristics, enhancing adaptability while maintaining localized simplicity through context-specific rules.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11364919B2Driving behavior evaluation device, driving behavior evaluation method, and non-transitory storage medium storing driving behavior evaluation program
Publication Date: 2022.06.21 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US11364919B2 patent drawing
  • US11364919B2 patent drawing
  • US11364919B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving behavior evaluation device includes a memory and a processor. In a case in which a speed of a target vehicle exceeds a regulation speed and an amount of deviation of the speed of the target vehicle with respect to an average speed of vehicles around the target vehicle is equal to or greater than a threshold value, the processor is configured to set an evaluation of driving behavior of the target vehicle to a lower value than in a case in which the speed of the target vehicle exceeds the regulation speed and the amount of deviation is less than the threshold value.