Autonomous Driving Mode Switching by Driver Intervention Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Drivers experience burden when switching between autonomous, cooperative, and manual driving modes due to the need for manual intervention and operation of switches during autonomous driving.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous driving vehicle system that includes a peripheral information detection unit, traveling plan generation unit, driving operation information acquisition unit, and driving state switching unit to dynamically switch between autonomous, cooperative, and manual driving modes based on detected operation amounts and duration counts, reducing the need for manual switch operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the driver manually operates a switch to switch among autonomous driving modes, then the driving mode switching can be controlled, but the driver burden increases due to frequent manual intervention

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver burdenVSAvoidautomatic mode switching
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic driving state switching by detecting the driver's operation amount and duration count, allowing the system to self-adjust between autonomous, cooperative, and manual driving states without requiring the driver to manually operate switches. The ECU automatically determines state transitions based on detected operation parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the driver's operation amount and duration count, using this feedback information to dynamically adjust the driving state. The ECU receives feedback from operation detection units and automatically switches driving states based on predefined thresholds, creating a closed-loop control system that responds to driver behavior.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Device complexity

If the system requires manual switch operation for mode switching, then precise mode selection is achieved, but the complexity of the control system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveswitch operation mechanismVSAvoidautomatic state transition
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts the manual switch operation from the driving state transition process, removing the physical switch and its control mechanism. Instead, the system uses operation detection units to monitor driver behavior and automatically triggers state transitions based on detected operation amounts and duration counts, eliminating the need for manual switch intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical switch operation with an electronic detection and control system. The ECU electronically monitors operation parameters and automatically executes state transitions through electronic control signals, substituting the mechanical switch mechanism with an electronic automation system that reduces overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If the driver intervenes temporarily during autonomous driving, then safety is improved through human judgment, but the switching process becomes more cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety through driver interventionVSAvoidswitching operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic driving state adjustment based on real-time detection of driver operation amount and duration count. When the driver temporarily intervenes, the system dynamically transitions from autonomous to cooperative or manual driving state, and automatically returns to autonomous state when intervention ends, creating a flexible and adaptive switching mechanism that responds to temporary driver needs without cumbersome operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12434743B2Autonomous driving vehicle system
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12434743B2 patent drawing
  • US12434743B2 patent drawing
  • US12434743B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system includes an acquisition unit that acquires an operation amount or a duration count, and a switching unit that switches a driving state. The switching unit switches the driving state to the cooperative driving state when the operation amount is equal to or greater than an intervention threshold and less than a start threshold or the duration count is equal to or greater than a first threshold and less than a second threshold during the autonomous driving state, switches the driving state to the autonomous driving state when the operation amount is less than the intervention threshold or the duration count is less than the first threshold during the cooperative driving state, and switches the driving state to the manual driving state when the operation amount is equal to or greater than the start threshold or the duration count is equal to or greater than the second threshold.