Automated Driving Offset Control for Driver Comfort

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In autonomous driving systems, offset control can cause discomfort for drivers who do not monitor the periphery, leading to troublesome acceleration, especially during periods without periphery monitoring obligations.

Innovation Solution

An automated driving control device that switches between driving assistance with periphery monitoring and autonomous travel without monitoring, limiting offset control execution during autonomous driving periods and adjusting offset control based on lane position, traffic congestion, and driver status to reduce lateral acceleration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If offset control is executed during autonomous driving without periphery monitoring obligation, then safety distance from other vehicles is increased, but driver comfort deteriorates due to troublesome lateral acceleration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety distanceVSAvoiddriver comfort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the execution of offset control based on the autonomous driving level. At Level 3 (with periphery monitoring obligation), offset control is executed to maintain safety distance. At Level 4 (without periphery monitoring obligation), offset control is limited or not executed to prevent troublesome lateral acceleration and improve driver comfort. This dynamic switching resolves the contradiction by adapting the control strategy to the specific operational context.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Reliability

If offset control is continuously executed to maintain safety distance, then collision risk is reduced, but frequency of lateral acceleration increases causing driver annoyance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision riskVSAvoiddriver annoyance
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different control qualities to different driving scenarios. When the driver has periphery monitoring obligation (Level 3), offset control is actively executed to maintain safety distance and reduce collision risk. When the driver does not have monitoring obligation (Level 4), the control quality changes to limit offset execution, thereby reducing lateral acceleration frequency and driver annoyance. This localized adaptation of control quality resolves the contradiction between safety and comfort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20240010216A1Automated driving control device, non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing automated driving control program, presentation control device, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing presentation control program
Publication Date: 2024.01.11 DENSO CORP
  • US20240010216A1 patent drawing
  • US20240010216A1 patent drawing
  • US20240010216A1 patent drawing

AI summary

By an automate driving control device, a presentation control device, a non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing an automated driving control device or a presentation control program, an offset control is executed and the execution is limited or, whether to execute the offset control is recognized and notification related to the offset control is performed.