Autonomous Driving Policy Learning With Two-Stage Neural Training

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing autonomous vehicle systems face limitations in robustness, sensing ability, efficiency, and extendibility due to separate object detection, tracking, and prediction models, leading to significant information loss and decreased reliability, particularly in crowded conditions, and require significant computing resources for deep neural networks.

Innovation Solution

A deep neural network is trained in two stages: first using object detection loss for feature learning, then reinforced with reinforcement learning to determine optimal driving policies, incorporating sensor data from multiple vehicles for enhanced sensing range and reliability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If separate object detection, tracking, and prediction models are used, then each model can be optimized independently, but significant information loss occurs and reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveIndependent model optimizationVSAvoidSystem reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges separate object detection, tracking, and prediction models into a unified deep neural network that processes sensor data end-to-end. This integration eliminates information loss between separate models while maintaining the ability to learn optimal driving policies directly from raw sensor inputs, thereby improving reliability without sacrificing optimization capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Extent of automation

If deep neural networks are used for autonomous vehicle systems, then decision-making capability is improved, but significant computing power and resources are required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDecision-making capabilityVSAvoidComputing power and resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the training process into two distinct stages: first stage training that pre-trains the deep neural network using object detection loss, and second stage training that fine-tunes the network using reinforcement learning. This segmentation reduces computational complexity by breaking down the resource-intensive training into manageable phases, allowing the system to achieve high decision-making capability while optimizing resource utilization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If sensor data from only one vehicle is used, then the system is simpler to implement, but sensing range and field of view are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveSystem implementation complexityVSAvoidSensing range and field of view
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a multi-vehicle data fusion system where sensor data from multiple vehicles is integrated into a unified deep neural network model. This approach allows the system to maintain a single standardized processing architecture (preserving simplicity) while simultaneously achieving extended sensing range and improved field of view by incorporating data from multiple vehicle sources.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Loss of time

If a single-stage training approach is used, then training is faster, but the system cannot achieve optimal performance for both feature extraction and decision-making

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveTraining timeVSAvoidOptimal performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by implementing a two-stage training process where the first stage pre-trains the deep neural network using object detection loss to learn robust feature representations. This preliminary training establishes a strong foundation that enables the second stage to efficiently fine-tune the model using reinforcement learning for optimal decision-making, thereby achieving both time efficiency and optimal performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS12524495B2Systems and methods for end-to-end learning of optimal driving policy
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 TOYOTA JIDOSHA KK
  • US12524495B2 patent drawing
  • US12524495B2 patent drawing
  • US12524495B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for learning optimal driving behavior for autonomous vehicles comprises a deep neural network, a first stage training module, and a second stage training module. The deep neural network comprises a feature learning network configured to receive sensor data from a vehicle as input and output spatial temporal feature embeddings and a decision action network configured to receive the spatial temporal feature embeddings as input and output an optimal driving policy for the vehicle. The first training stage module is configured to, during a first training stage, train the feature learning network using object detection loss. The second stage training module is configured to, during a second training stage, train the decision action network using reinforcement learning.