Automated Driving Risk Area Mapping for Accurate Route Regulation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional automated driving systems inaccurately determine dangerous areas based solely on sudden braking events, leading to potential oversight in risk area identification.

Innovation Solution

An automated driving system that utilizes operational and infrastructure information databases to identify risk types and set accurate risk areas, adjusting vehicle routes based on vehicle position and risk area settings.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If risk areas are determined only based on sudden braking events, then the system can quickly identify dangerous areas, but the accuracy of risk area identification deteriorates due to incorrect determination

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespeed of risk area identificationVSAvoidaccuracy of risk area identification
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the risk identification process into multiple independent evaluation dimensions: sudden braking events, acceleration events, and infrastructure sensor detections. Each dimension independently evaluates different aspects of potential hazards, and their results are integrated to form a comprehensive risk assessment. This segmentation allows the system to maintain quick response while improving accuracy by not relying solely on one indicator.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a multi-functional evaluation system where the risk determination mechanism serves multiple purposes: it processes sudden braking data, acceleration data, infrastructure sensor information, and integrates them into a unified risk assessment. This universal approach allows the same system to handle diverse hazard types without sacrificing speed or accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Measurement precision

If multiple types of field information are integrated to identify risk types, then the accuracy of risk area identification is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of risk area identificationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary risk determination mechanism that acts as a mediator between multiple information sources (operational information, infrastructure information) and the final risk area identification. This intermediary layer processes and integrates diverse inputs using predefined evaluation criteria, transforming complex multi-source data into structured risk assessments without requiring direct complex interactions between all components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameters of information processing by transforming raw operational and infrastructure data into standardized risk evaluation parameters. Different types of information (braking events, acceleration events, sensor detections) are converted into comparable parameter formats that can be systematically integrated, reducing complexity while maintaining comprehensive analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the system sets wide hazardous areas to ensure safety, then the safety coverage is improved, but the productivity of vehicle operation deteriorates due to unnecessary route restrictions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety coverageVSAvoidvehicle operation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by setting risk areas with spatially varying characteristics based on the specific type and location of hazards. Instead of uniform wide hazardous zones, the system identifies and marks specific local areas with different risk levels and characteristics, allowing vehicles to navigate safely through low-risk areas while avoiding high-risk zones. This localized approach maintains safety coverage while preserving vehicle productivity in safe regions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250388233A1Automated Driving System, Driving Regulation Method, and Driving Regulation Program
Publication Date: 2025.12.25 ASTEMO LTD
  • US20250388233A1 patent drawing
  • US20250388233A1 patent drawing
  • US20250388233A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated driving system, a driving regulation method, and a driving regulation program that make it possible to set risk areas accurately and thereby achieve safe automated driving are provided. Included are a risk area setting unit 111 that identifies a risk type from field information on planning or operation, recorded in an operational information database 101 and an infrastructure information database 103, and that sets a predetermined area in a field area, as a risk area, on the basis of the risk type, and a vehicle route setting unit 117 that sets a traveling route for a vehicle 2 traveling in the field area, on the basis of vehicle position information of the vehicle 2 and the risk area set by the risk area setting unit 111.