Driving Style Driver Identification for Vehicle Function Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for remote vehicle driver identification are unreliable due to issues with telematics log-in procedures and biometric data matching, often resulting in incorrect or incomplete identification of drivers.

Innovation Solution

The system determines driver identity by analyzing and comparing driving styles with a database of reference styles, using event detection and reporting systems to collect and process data on driving behaviors, and updates biometric data for improved accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If telematics log-in procedures are used for driver identification, then driver identity can be determined, but the identification is unreliable due to improper logging in, data transmission failures, corrupted or faked data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver identification reliabilityVSAvoidlog-in data integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces driving style data as an intermediary verification layer between the driver and the identification system. Instead of relying solely on direct log-in data, the system uses driving style characteristics (speeding patterns, braking habits, lane changing behavior) as a mediator to verify driver identity, making the identification process more reliable against corrupted or faked log-in data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring driving style data and comparing it against stored driver profiles. This feedback loop allows the system to verify driver identity dynamically during the driving excursion, correcting or confirming the initial identification based on actual driving behavior patterns

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If camera-based biometric measurements are used for driver identification, then driver identity can be established, but there will very rarely be perfect alignment between stored biometric data and measured data

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebiometric identification accuracyVSAvoidbiometric data alignment precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the identification parameters from static biometric measurements (facial features) to dynamic driving style parameters (speeding frequency, braking patterns, lane changing behavior). These driving style parameters are more stable and consistent over time, reducing the misalignment problem inherent in biometric data that changes with lighting, angle, and facial expressions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of relying on direct biometric copying and matching, the system creates a behavioral copy or profile of each driver's driving style. This behavioral profile serves as a more reliable reference that can be consistently matched against actual driving excursions, avoiding the alignment issues of biometric data

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If driving style analysis is used for driver identification, then driver identity can be determined with higher reliability, but the system complexity increases due to data collection and comparison requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver identification reliabilityVSAvoiddata collection and processing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the driving style data collection serve multiple functions: it collects data for safety event detection, driver behavior analysis, and driver identification simultaneously. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity by using a single data collection infrastructure for multiple purposes rather than requiring separate systems for each function

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses the driver's own driving behavior data to identify and verify their identity, eliminating the need for separate identification hardware or procedures. The driving style data that is already being collected for safety and operational purposes serves the additional function of driver identification, making the system self-identifying

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS11993270B2System and method for driving style driver identity determination and control of vehicle functions
Publication Date: 2024.05.28 RM ACQUISITION LLC
  • US11993270B2 patent drawing
  • US11993270B2 patent drawing
  • US11993270B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for controlling a vehicle based on a driving style determined driver identity includes sensors that capture driving-style-based data characterizing a driving style of an unknown driver. The system also includes a control unit that determines a driving style vector of the unknown driver from the captured driving-style-based data. The control unit compares the driving style vector of the unknown driver to driving style vectors of a plurality of known drivers to generate a similarity score for each of the plurality of known drivers. The control unit ranks the plurality of known drivers according to their respective similarity scores, and identifies the unknown driver as at least one of the ranked known drivers based on the respective similarity scores. The control unit controls vehicle systems based on the identification of the unknown driver.