Drone Crash Command Authentication for Urgent Collision Avoidance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Unmanned aircraft, or drones, often pose a risk of collision due to operator inexperience or lack of control, particularly in confined spaces, where there is insufficient time for a controlled landing to prevent injury or damage.

Innovation Solution

The system equips drones with sensors and processors that detect and authenticate commands to stop flying, allowing authorized users to cause an intentional crash to avoid collisions with higher-priority objects, ensuring only authorized users can initiate a crash by terminating power to the flight engine.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a controlled landing procedure is implemented to prevent collision, then safety of people and objects is improved, but response time is insufficient in urgent situations

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-authenticates multiple authorized users and stores their credentials before emergencies occur. When a crash command is issued, the system immediately verifies the command against stored credentials without requiring real-time authentication, enabling instant response while maintaining security.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements an urgent crash function that bypasses the normal controlled landing sequence. When an authenticated authorized user issues a crash command, the system immediately terminates flight operations by cutting power to flight controls, skipping the time-consuming controlled landing procedure to achieve rapid intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #21Skipping (Rushing through)

2Ease of operation

If any user can issue a stop command, then ease of operation is improved, but unauthorized damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommand accessibilityVSAvoidunauthorized damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors crash commands and provides immediate feedback by verifying the command source against stored authorized user credentials. This feedback mechanism ensures that only authenticated users can initiate crashes, preventing unauthorized damage while maintaining the ability for quick response when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces an authentication intermediary layer between the crash command and the actual crash execution. The processor acts as a mediator that intercepts crash commands, verifies authorized user credentials, and only permits the crash function if authentication succeeds, thereby protecting against unauthorized damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If immediate crash function is implemented, then collision prevention is improved, but drone integrity is compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision preventionVSAvoiddrone integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The system accepts that drone damage is an inevitable consequence of immediate crash intervention and converts this harm into a benefit by prioritizing human safety. The authorized user crash function deliberately sacrifices drone integrity to prevent greater harm to people or expensive objects, treating the drone as a disposable safety mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

4Strength

If controlled landing is used, then drone integrity is preserved, but safety response is too slow for urgent situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrone integrityVSAvoidsafety response time
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements dynamic response selection that adapts to the urgency of the situation. For routine operations, controlled landing is used to preserve drone integrity. For urgent situations involving authorized users, the system dynamically switches to immediate crash mode, adjusting the response strategy based on real-time needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11281234B2Methods and systems for crashing unmanned aircraft
Publication Date: 2022.03.22 MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
  • US11281234B2 patent drawing
  • US11281234B2 patent drawing
  • US11281234B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An unmanned aircraft includes one or more sensors. The sensors identify a predefined crash command from an environment about the unmanned aircraft. One or more processors, operable with the one or more sensors, then determine whether a source of the predefined crash command is authorized to crash the unmanned aircraft. Where the source of the predefined crash command is authorized to crash the unmanned aircraft, the one or more processors crash the unmanned aircraft. Where the source of the command requesting the unmanned aircraft to stop flying is unauthorized to crash the unmanned aircraft, the one or more processors can land the unmanned aircraft without crashing.