Autonomous Drone Delivery via Facility Agent Negotiation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The use of drones for package delivery raises concerns about security and privacy, as they may violate individuals' privacy and the security of institutions, and there is a need for secure, privacy-aware, and contextualized navigation within secure facilities like government buildings, hospitals, and residential areas.

Innovation Solution

A system and method involving an autonomous drone and a facility agent that negotiate a delivery strategy through a communication protocol, where the facility agent computes access options based on contextual information, security, and privacy exposure rules, ensuring secure and privacy-aware operation by authorizing drone entry and supervising navigation within the facility.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If drones are used for package delivery, then delivery efficiency and scalability are improved, but security and privacy concerns are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity and privacy risks
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces facility agents as intermediary components that mediate between drones and facilities. These agents autonomously negotiate access strategies, evaluate security constraints, and coordinate delivery operations without requiring human intervention. The facility agent acts as a buffer that filters and manages security risks while enabling efficient delivery operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-computing multiple access strategies and evaluating them against security constraints before actual delivery operations. The facility agent autonomously negotiates and selects appropriate delivery strategies in advance, ensuring security requirements are met before the drone enters the facility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If drones navigate within secure facilities, then delivery flexibility is improved, but privacy exposure risks are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery flexibilityVSAvoidprivacy exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic strategy selection where the facility agent evaluates multiple access strategies and selects the most appropriate one based on real-time conditions and security constraints. The system can dynamically adjust delivery approaches, navigation routes, and access methods to balance flexibility with privacy protection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by computing different access strategies with varying levels of privacy exposure and security risk. The facility agent selects strategies that optimize the balance between delivery flexibility and privacy protection by adjusting navigation parameters, access points, and operational modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If drones operate autonomously without human intervention, then operational efficiency is improved, but security control is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsecurity control
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service through autonomous facility agents that independently negotiate with drones, evaluate security constraints, and coordinate deliveries without human intervention. The system serves itself by autonomously managing security protocols, accessing facility information, and making delivery decisions, thereby maintaining both efficiency and security control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Measurement precision

If drones access local facility information, then delivery precision is improved, but security risks are worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery precisionVSAvoidsecurity risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and uses only the specific facility information necessary for precise delivery while filtering out sensitive data. The facility agent selectively accesses local information such as building layouts and recipient locations needed for navigation, while maintaining security by not exposing unnecessary sensitive facility data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS9523986B1System and method for secure, privacy-aware and contextualised package delivery using autonomous vehicles
Publication Date: 2016.12.20 HCL TECH LTD
  • US9523986B1 patent drawing
  • US9523986B1 patent drawing
  • US9523986B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a system for coordinating the delivery of a payload by a drone to a recipient, the system comprising a drone; where the drone is an autonomous vehicle that is operative to perform one or more functions without human intervention; and a facility agent acting on behalf of a facility in which the recipient is located; where the facility agent is autonomous and is operative to act on behalf of either the recipient or the facility in which the recipient is located; and where the facility agent comprises an access option enumerator for computing a set of delivery strategies in accordance with a constraint or a goal; and an access negotiator for reaching an agreement between the drone and the facility agent on the delivery strategy for the payload.