Drone-Based Identity Verification for Fraud Mitigation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems face challenges in predicting and preventing fraudulent transactions, especially in authenticating suspicious transactions at payment locations, as conventional methods struggle to identify unauthorized users, such as family members or friends, using credit, debit, or charge cards.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system that employs drones for advanced authentication and fraud detection, utilizing geo-location verification, facial recognition, and biometric analysis to validate customer locations and transactions, deploying drones to gather information and prevent fraudulent activities.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional authentication methods are used, then transaction processing is simple and fast, but fraud detection capability is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefraud detection capabilityVSAvoidauthentication system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication system is segmented into multiple independent components: geo-location verification module, biometric analysis module, drone deployment module, and transaction validation module. Each component performs a specific function, allowing the system to achieve high fraud detection capability while maintaining modularity and manageable complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds spatial dimension by deploying physical drones to transaction locations for on-site verification. This transitions from traditional 2D digital authentication to 3D physical-digital integrated authentication, enhancing fraud detection through multi-dimensional validation including location verification, visual identification, and environmental context

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If additional validation layers are added, then fraud detection accuracy improves, but transaction processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransaction authentication accuracyVSAvoidtransaction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary geo-location verification and risk assessment before triggering full authentication. High-risk transactions identified through location discrepancy or unusual patterns automatically initiate drone deployment and biometric verification, while low-risk transactions proceed quickly, optimizing the balance between security and processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements real-time feedback loops where transaction data, location information, and biometric results are continuously analyzed. The feedback mechanism allows dynamic adjustment of validation intensity based on risk levels, enabling accurate fraud detection while minimizing processing time for legitimate transactions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12093957B1Transaction validation and fraud mitigation
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US12093957B1 patent drawing
  • US12093957B1 patent drawing
  • US12093957B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods that can verify transactions based upon location disparity between an account holder and POS (point of sale) as well as identity of a customer are provided. The system can employ camera-equipped drones or other image capture mechanisms to perform identity verification on behalf of a financial entity, cardholder or merchant. Further, the innovation provides systems and methodologies by which allegedly fraudulent or suspect transactions can be blocked or further investigated in real- or near real-time so as to assist in loss mitigation and potentially identification of fraudsters.