Drone Inspection Timing Determination via Flight Plan History Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing aerial vehicle management techniques lack an efficient method to determine the optimal timing for inspections, leading to unnecessary frequent inspections and potential performance degradation due to undetected component deterioration.

Innovation Solution

An information-processing device that acquires flight plans and histories, calculates differences between them, and determines inspection timings based on these differences, accounting for factors like collision avoidance, weather, and flight plan difficulty, to minimize unnecessary inspections and ensure timely maintenance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If inspections are performed frequently to ensure safety, then reliability is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to loss of operational time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidoperational time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of inspection timing from fixed periodic intervals to variable intervals based on accumulated flight hours and flight condition data. This allows inspections to be scheduled based on actual usage patterns rather than conservative fixed schedules, improving productivity while maintaining reliability through data-driven timing decisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring flight history data, flight conditions, and component performance metrics to dynamically adjust inspection timing. This feedback loop enables the system to learn from actual operational patterns and optimize inspection schedules, reducing unnecessary inspections while ensuring safety when needed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If inspections are delayed to extend operational life, then productivity is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to potential component failure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational continuityVSAvoidcomponent failure risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of flight history data and component wear patterns to predict optimal inspection timing before failures occur. By proactively scheduling inspections based on predicted component degradation trends rather than reacting to failures or using conservative fixed schedules, the system extends operational life while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The inspection scheduling system transitions from static fixed intervals to dynamic timing based on actual component usage and degradation patterns. The system adapts inspection schedules in real-time based on monitored parameters such as flight hours, environmental conditions, and component performance, allowing extensions of operational life when conditions permit while ensuring safety when degradation is detected.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Ease of operation

If inspections are performed based on fixed schedules, then ease of operation is improved, but loss of time increases due to unnecessary inspections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescheduling simplicityVSAvoidinspection time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service by automatically analyzing flight history data and generating optimized inspection schedules without requiring manual intervention. The automated system processes flight data, applies analysis algorithms, and produces inspection recommendations, reducing the operational burden while minimizing unnecessary inspections and associated time losses.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If component deterioration is not detected, then productivity is maintained, but reliability deteriorates due to undetected performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous operationVSAvoidperformance degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual inspection mechanisms with automated data analysis systems that continuously monitor flight history and component performance metrics. This substitution enables continuous operation without interruption while simultaneously detecting performance degradation through automated analysis of operational data, maintaining both productivity and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS11645879B2Information-processing device and information-processing method for determining an inspection timing for an aerial vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.05.09 NTT DOCOMO INC
  • US11645879B2 patent drawing
  • US11645879B2 patent drawing
  • US11645879B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Flight control unit and flight unit start flight in accordance with a flight plan. Flight history acquisition unit acquires a flight history of drone. Flight plan acquisition unit acquires a flight plan for drone. Inspection timing determination unit calculates a difference between the acquired flight plan and the acquired flight history, and based on the difference, determines an inspection timing for drone. Inspection timing notification unit provides notification of the determined inspection timing.