Agricultural Drone Takeoff Interlock for Pre-Flight Safety Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous drones used for spraying agricultural chemicals lack safety mechanisms to prevent accidents, particularly when operated by non-specialists, as they do not account for obstacles, incorrect flight directions, maintenance status, or environmental conditions.

Innovation Solution

Incorporating a position and direction acquisition unit, flight area determination, and flight control unit to prohibit take-off when the drone is outside a designated area, detects obstacles, or is not properly maintained, and ensuring safe operational conditions such as temperature and altitude ranges are met.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If autonomous flight control is implemented, then productivity and efficiency are improved, but safety and reliability deteriorate due to lack of foolproof mechanisms

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespraying efficiencyVSAvoidflight safety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary checks before takeoff by acquiring the drone's position and direction, comparing them against stored flight area and intrusion pathway information, and checking maintenance status. This preliminary validation prevents unsafe flights before they occur, resolving the contradiction by ensuring safety checks are completed in advance while maintaining autonomous productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The flight control unit receives feedback from position acquisition, direction acquisition, and maintenance status checks. This feedback loop allows the system to make informed decisions about whether to permit takeoff, combining autonomous operation with safety verification through continuous monitoring and comparison against predefined safe parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If foolproof mechanisms are added for non-specialist operators, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The drone performs self-verification of its own position, direction, and maintenance status before takeoff. The flight control unit automatically compares acquired data against stored flight area information and intrusion pathway data, and checks maintenance status without requiring external validation. This self-service approach provides foolproof safety mechanisms while minimizing the complexity burden on operators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

All safety checks including position verification, direction verification, and maintenance status checks are performed automatically before takeoff. This preliminary action embeds the foolproof mechanisms within the normal operation flow, making them appear simple to users while providing comprehensive safety verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If comprehensive safety checks are performed before takeoff, then reliability is improved, but loss of time increases due to additional verification steps

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflight safetyVSAvoidpre-flight preparation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The drone autonomously performs all safety checks including position acquisition, direction acquisition, and maintenance status verification without requiring manual intervention or extended preparation time from operators. The flight control unit automatically compares data against stored information and makes takeoff decisions, making the comprehensive safety checks appear instantaneous to users while maintaining thorough verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual safety verification procedures are replaced with automated electronic systems that acquire position and direction data, compare against stored flight area information, and check maintenance status electronically. This substitution of mechanical/manual verification with automated electronic verification maintains comprehensive safety checks while dramatically reducing the time required for pre-flight preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12014641B2Agricultural drone having improved foolproof
Publication Date: 2024.06.18 NILEWORKS INC
  • US12014641B2 patent drawing
  • US12014641B2 patent drawing
  • US12014641B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A drone (an aerial vehicle), able to maintain improved safety for operation by non-specialists, is provided. A farm field data stored in a cloud at take-off is compared to an environment data read by a sensor, and a control to prohibit take-off is performed if any danger is considered. In particular, it is desirable to prohibit if there is a traffic, where people and cars may pass, between the farm field and a current location, and if a direction of the drone, installed, does not point to a direction of an intrusion pathway to the target farm field. Furthermore, it is desirable to prohibit take-off if a predetermined maintenance is not performed by referring to a maintenance history.