Drop Conveyor Sortation With Actuatable Doors and Bin Reuse

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing object distribution systems require large numbers of collection bins and incur high costs due to inefficiencies in matching incoming objects to assigned destinations, often relying on human labor or complex mechanical diverts, and struggle with handling objects outside system specifications.

Innovation Solution

A distribution system with an urging mechanism and actuatable doors directs objects to appropriate receiving stations, using perception units and actuatable doors to selectively drop objects into designated chutes, and an induction system filters out incompatible objects before processing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If human workers or automated systems retrieve objects and sort each into collection bins based on heuristics, then objects can be sorted to multiple destinations, but a large number of collection bins are required which increases physical space, capital costs, and operating costs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesorting capability to multiple destinationsVSAvoidnumber of collection bins
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The sortation process is divided into multiple passes, with each pass handling a subset of destinations. Objects are sorted in stages rather than all at once, allowing the system to serve many destinations using a limited number of bins at any given time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Collection bins are reused across different passes. After one pass completes, bins are emptied and reassigned to different destination groups in subsequent passes. This periodic reuse of the same physical bins allows the system to handle more destinations than the number of physical bins available.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

2Extent of automation

If recirculating conveyors with tilt trays are used for automated sortation, then automation level increases, but mechanical complexity and costs increase due to required actuators for each divert

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomated sortationVSAvoidmechanical complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex actuation mechanism is extracted from the conveyor system and replaced with simple gravity-fed chutes. Objects are directed to different bins using passive gravitational flow paths rather than active mechanical tilting of each tray, eliminating the need for numerous actuators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The mechanical tilt-tray actuation system is replaced with a gravity-based passive sortation system. Instead of using motors and actuators to tilt trays, the system uses gravity to naturally guide objects down chutes into the appropriate collection bins based on their destination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If conventional sortation systems process all objects through the same system, then processing is simplified, but objects outside system specifications can cause damage to robotic systems

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing system uniformityVSAvoidsystem protection from incompatible objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

An induction system performs preliminary filtering of objects before they enter the main sortation system. Incompatible objects are identified and diverted early in the process, preventing them from reaching and potentially damaging robotic components downstream.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The induction system acts as an intermediary between the incoming object stream and the main sortation system. It screens objects and selectively passes only compatible ones to the robotic system, while diverting incompatible objects to a separate handling path.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If a large number of collection bins are used to handle diverse objects, then all objects can be sorted simultaneously, but physical space requirements and capital costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesortation throughputVSAvoidphysical space
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The destination set is segmented into multiple groups, with each group assigned to a subset of bins for a specific pass. This allows the system to handle a large total number of destinations using a smaller number of physical bins at any one time, reducing space requirements while maintaining throughput capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically reconfigures bin assignments between passes. Bins are reassigned to different destination groups in subsequent passes, allowing the same physical bins to serve multiple destinations over time. This dynamic reuse increases effective throughput without requiring proportional increases in physical space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12536394B2Systems and methods for separating objects using drop conveyors with one or more object processing systems
Publication Date: 2026.01.27 BERKSHIRE GREY OPERATING CO INC
  • US12536394B2 patent drawing
  • US12536394B2 patent drawing
  • US12536394B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A distribution system is disclosed for use with an induction system with an object processing system. The distribution system provides distribution of dissimilar objects into one of a plurality of receiving units. The distribution system includes an urging system for urging an object on a conveyor from the conveyor to a chute that includes at least one actuatable door for selectively dropping the object through the at least one actuable door, said chute leading to a first receiving station with a second receiving station being positioned below the at least one actuable door.