Drop Fiber Intrusion Detection via Signal Multiplexing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing optical fiber intrusion detection systems are limited in their ability to discern which specific branch or drop fiber is being disturbed within a network, particularly in Passive Optical Network (PON) architectures, where multiple premises are served by a single optical fiber.

Innovation Solution

A method that utilizes a multiplexing system to separate and analyze monitor signals across multiple drop fibers, modifying the monitor signal at the source or terminals to differentiate between fibers based on wavelength, polarization, or frequency, allowing for the detection of intrusion events and identification of affected fibers through unique signal characteristics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single optical fiber is used to serve multiple premises in a PON architecture, then the amount of fiber and equipment required is reduced, but the ability to discern which specific branch or drop fiber is being disturbed is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamount of fiber and equipmentVSAvoidability to discern which drop fiber is disturbed
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring function by distributing monitoring devices to both ends of the fiber. Each end independently monitors the same fiber, dividing the monitoring task into separate functional segments that work together to achieve complete coverage and identification capability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary identification mechanism where each monitoring device is assigned a unique identifier. This intermediary element allows the system to distinguish which specific device detected the disturbance, thereby identifying the affected drop fiber without requiring separate physical monitoring paths

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If monitoring devices are distributed to both ends of the fiber, then the ability to identify affected fibers is improved, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to identify affected fibersVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The monitoring devices at both ends perform the same universal monitoring function using identical or similar technology. This multi-functionality approach allows either end to independently detect disturbances, eliminating the need for complex specialized equipment at each location while maintaining high identification accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If traditional alarmed carrier systems are used with two fibers, then reliable monitoring is achieved, but the cost and complexity of the system increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the monitoring functions that traditionally required two separate fibers into a single fiber system. By combining the monitoring capabilities at both ends of one fiber and using identifier-based discrimination, the system achieves reliable monitoring equivalent to traditional two-fiber systems while reducing infrastructure complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables accurate detection and differentiation of intrusion events on specific drop fibers within a PON network, enhancing security and reducing the complexity and cost of monitoring systems by using existing infrastructure and low-cost electronic analysis.

Implementation Method 1

transmitting a monitoring signal through a fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical signal transmission: Optical Fibre

Implementation Method 2

uses Fresnel reflections and Rayleigh backscattering in time sliced data to locate the intrusion event at its position along a fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRayleigh backscattering: Rayleigh Scattering

Implementation Method 3

uses Fresnel reflections and Rayleigh backscattering in time sliced data to locate the intrusion event at its position along a fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFresnel reflection: Reflection

Implementation Method 4

modifying the monitor signal at said monitor signal source and/or at said multiplexing and/or at said returning so that the monitor signal of one drop fiber has a difference from the monitor signal of another drop fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWavelength division multiplexing:

Implementation Method 5

modifying the monitor signal at said monitor signal source and/or at said multiplexing and/or at said returning so that the monitor signal of one drop fiber has a difference from the monitor signal of another drop fiber

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPolarization: Polarisation

Data Source

PatentUS9374157B2Drop discriminating network alarm system utilizing a single sensing fiber
Publication Date: 2016.06.21 NETWORK INTEGRITY SYSTEMS INC
  • US9374157B2 patent drawing
  • US9374157B2 patent drawing
  • US9374157B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method is provided for detecting movement indicative of intrusion events on optical drop fibers of a network where the individual drop fiber can be identified to locate the event. The method uses a monitor system at the network end and multiplexing the monitor signal along the individual fibers to the respective terminals. At each of the terminals, the monitor signal is returned unchanged or in modified form along the same or different fibers to the network end. At the network end the received monitor signals is analyzed for changes in said monitor signals indicative of movement. Which one or more of the drop fibers has triggered the alarm is determined by modifying the monitor signal in wavelength or polarization, or by applying a modulation at the source and/or at multiplexing and/or at returning so that the monitor signal of one drop fiber has a difference from the monitor signal of another drop fiber.