Droplet Actuator Interface Mapping Logical Channels to Physical Pins

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of droplet actuator design and operation requires advanced software development to effectively manage electrode interactions and communication protocols, as existing systems face challenges in compatibility and interoperability between controllers, interfaces, and droplet actuators, leading to inefficiencies in droplet operations.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize interface description files to map logical channels to physical pins, translate logical inputs and outputs, and associate functions with electrode groups, enabling seamless communication and operation across different hardware components without modifying the droplet operation protocols, and incorporating a physical design library for electrode configurations and a router for route planning within the droplet actuator.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If droplet actuator design and operation become more complex to perform advanced droplet operations, then droplet operation capabilities are improved, but software development requirements and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedroplet operation capabilitiesVSAvoidsoftware development requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is segmented into distinct modular components: a controller that generates control signals, an interface that translates and conditionally asserts signals, and a droplet actuator that executes operations. This segmentation allows each component to be independently developed and optimized, reducing overall software complexity while maintaining advanced droplet operation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An interface component acts as an intermediary between the controller and droplet actuator. It receives control signals from the controller, translates them into appropriate assertion signals, and conditionally asserts signals to the droplet actuator based on its internal state. This intermediary layer simplifies the software development burden by handling signal translation and state management automatically.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If different controllers, interfaces, and droplet actuators are used to increase system versatility, then adaptability is improved, but compatibility and interoperability problems arise

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem versatilityVSAvoidcompatibility and interoperability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The interface is designed as a universal component that can work with different controllers and droplet actuators. It implements a standardized signal translation mechanism that adapts control signals from various controllers into a common format suitable for droplet actuators, enabling interoperability across different hardware configurations without requiring custom integration code for each combination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The interface dynamically changes its operational parameters based on the specific controller and droplet actuator configuration. It adjusts signal assertion conditions, timing parameters, and voltage levels to match the characteristics of connected devices, ensuring reliable compatibility while maintaining system versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If signal assertion is always performed to simplify control, then ease of operation is improved, but unnecessary operations and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol simplicityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The interface incorporates feedback mechanisms that monitor its internal state and the state of connected devices before asserting signals. It uses this feedback information to determine whether signal assertion is necessary, avoiding unnecessary operations that would consume energy. The feedback loop enables intelligent decision-making about when to assert signals based on actual system conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The interface dynamically adjusts its signal assertion behavior based on real-time system conditions. Rather than always asserting signals, it adaptively enables or disables signal assertion based on the current state of the droplet actuator and controller, optimizing energy consumption while maintaining ease of operation through automatic state management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP3273059B1Methods, systems and products for conducting droplet operations
Publication Date: 2021.09.22 ADVANCED LIQUID LOGIC INC
  • EP3273059B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3273059B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3273059B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The present invention provides modified droplet actuator systems, software, and software-executed methods for use in droplet actuator operation and droplet actuator systems that are configured and programmed to execute such software. A system according to the invention comprises a processor executing code stored in memory that causes the processor to: a) determine a state of electrodes in a droplet actuator with each electrode having an applied voltage or a reference voltage; b) determine a vector having terms corresponding to a voltage of each electrode; and c) transform the vector into physical pin assignments for the droplet actuator.