Drowsy Driver Detection via Lane Violation Severity Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current vehicle control systems do not effectively detect and respond to drowsy drivers, despite their ability to maintain lane position through feedback and corrective inputs.

Innovation Solution

Integration of drowsy driver detection algorithms with onboard warning systems and lane keeping systems, utilizing cameras and image recognition to identify lane violations and calculate a drowsiness index, which triggers warnings and torque adjustments to address the drowsy driver condition.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stability of the object's composition

If lane keeping systems provide feedback and corrective inputs to maintain lane position, then lane position stability is improved, but the system cannot detect drowsy driver conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane position stabilityVSAvoiddrowsy driver detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the lane keeping system with a drowsy driver detection system into an integrated monitoring system. The lane violation detection data from the LK system is merged with driver behavior analysis to create a comprehensive drowsiness assessment, allowing the system to simultaneously maintain lane position and detect driver alertness levels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The monitoring system is designed to perform multiple functions: it tracks lane position for keeping purposes, detects lane violations, analyzes driver behavior patterns, and determines drowsy driver conditions. This multi-functional approach allows a single system to address both lane position stability and driver alertness detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If the system provides multiple types of feedback (audio, visual, haptic) to warn drowsy drivers, then driver alertness response is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver alertness responseVSAvoidfeedback system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback system dynamically adjusts the type and intensity of warnings based on the severity of drowsy driver conditions. The system progresses through multiple stages of intervention, starting with subtle cues and escalating to more prominent warnings, allowing it to adapt to the driver's response and condition severity rather than using a fixed complex system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a multi-level feedback mechanism where the type of warning provided depends on the driver's response to previous warnings and the current severity assessment. This feedback loop allows the system to simplify its operation by only activating necessary warning types based on real-time driver state, rather than continuously operating all warning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If the system monitors lane violations and calculates drowsiness index continuously, then detection accuracy is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedrowsiness detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs lane violation detection and drowsiness index calculation at periodic intervals rather than continuously. It monitors for lane violations and reassesses driver drowsiness at defined time points, maintaining detection accuracy while reducing computational load and energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies full monitoring and calculation resources only when lane violations are detected or when drowsiness risk is elevated. During normal operation with no violations, the system reduces its monitoring intensity, performing partial assessments that consume less energy while maintaining sufficient detection accuracy for safety-critical events.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS7719431B2Systems, methods and computer products for drowsy driver detection and response
Publication Date: 2010.05.18 GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
  • US7719431B2 patent drawing
  • US7719431B2 patent drawing
  • US7719431B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods and computer products for drowsy driver detection and response. Exemplary embodiments include systems and methods and computer products for determining that a vehicle has engaged in a lane violation, determining a severity of the lane violation, determining a drowsy driver condition of the vehicle and responding to the drowsy driver condition via onboard warning, corrective actuation, or remote human interventions.